ArticleEnvironmental research2025
Ambient air pollution in critical windows of exposure and spontaneous miscarriage in a preconception cohort.
Article in Environmental research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mapping the Global Evidence on Environmental and Climatic Factors Linked to Human Fertility-Related Outcomes: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Critical Windows of Air Pollution Exposure During Spermatogenesis and Intrauterine Insemination Outcomes.Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology · 2026Article
- Changes in ambient environmental conditions correspond to variations inFrontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Impact of climate change on spontaneous abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Air pollution may increase spontaneous miscarriage risk, potentially through inflammation. Prior studies are heterogeneous, and none have used a mixtures approach. We used data from participants who conceived in a prospective time-to-pregnancy study (N = 446) in North Carolina to examine spontaneous miscarriage, defined as a positive home pregnancy test and a self-reported pregnancy loss before gestational week 20 (N = 101). We characterized average and peak exposure to PM
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.