ArticleJMIR human factors2025
User Requirements and Conceptual Design for an Electronic Data Platform for Interhospital Transfer Between Acute Care Hospitals: User-Centered Design Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Barriers and Facilitators to Artificial Intelligence Implementation in Diabetes Management from Healthcare Workers' Perspective: A Scoping Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The transfer of patients between hospitals, that is, interhospital transfer (IHT), introduces discontinuity of care, including gaps in health information transfer, which may worsen patient outcomes. Objective: This is the first phase of a 5-year research study. Our goals are (1) to understand the gaps in health information exchange (HIE) and the clinician experience in accessing and using the electronic health record (EHR) during IHT and (2) to identify clinician user requirements for the development of an internal EHR solution for IHT. Methods: We used prior work on HIE during IHT, coupled with a user-centered design (UCD) process to engage in discussions with clinical users and gather input on EHR workflow during IHT patient admission and planning. A total of 8 UCD sessions were held between February and July 2023, involving 18 clinicians who interact with the EHR during IHT, including 3 medicine residents, 10 advanced practice providers (APPs), and 5 direct care attendings-all responsible for caring for IHT patients at Brigham and Women's Hospital Cardiology, Medicine, Oncology, and intensive care unit services. Discussions highlighted facilitators and barriers and suggested improvements for data access and availability at the time of transfer. UCD sessions were recorded, analyzed, and coded by 2 independent reviewers to identify common themes driving suboptimal HIE. User requirements were derived from the sessions with users and iteratively refined throughout the process. Results: Qualitative analysis revealed that a significant number of frontline clinicians experience suboptimal availability of clinical information in the EHR at the time of IHT, including gaps in communication, incomplete data, and inefficient access to clinical data. User requirements emerged from these themes and primarily focused on information prioritization, data accessibility, and workflow and efficiency. Conclusions: Notable levels of missing information and inefficient access to clinical data were reported by end users caring for IHT patients at the time of transfer. Conducting user research to understand the current process of IHT, involving users in conceptual design and information architecture, and generating prototypes for feedback from users can aid in designing a solution that meets user needs. The results of these early UCD activities will be used to develop and implement a data platform to support clinicians during IHT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.