Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40446290›Full record

ReviewJMIR serious games2025

The Impact of Gamified Interventions on the Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Systematic Literature Review.

Jinsong Chen, Tingzhong Yang, Qilian He, Mingli Pang, Ying Cao, Zheng Liu, Linfei Li, Hsing-I Liu, Christopher Bullen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JMIR serious games, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jinsong ChenDepartment of Public Administration, Law School, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1833-7133
Tingzhong YangResearch Center for Tobacco Control, Zhejiang University and Research Center for Digital Health Theory and Management, ZJU National Health Big Data Institute, Center for Tobacco Control Research, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8234-0938
Qilian HeSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine, Dali University, Dali, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-1244
Mingli PangNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6988-1200
Ying CaoTencent IEG Social Value Exploration Center, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9700-7904
Zheng LiuTencent IEG Social Value Exploration Center, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-4440-0769
Linfei LiChina Taiping Insurance Group Ltd., Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2335-9343
Hsing-I LiuChina Taiping Insurance Group Ltd., Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4283-6066
Christopher BullenNational Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6807-2930

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requires consistent sustained management, including regular physical activity, pulmonary rehabilitation, and self-care adherence. Despite strong clinical guidelines, patient engagement remains a major challenge, leading to suboptimal disease control and increased health care use. Gamified interventions have emerged as potential tools to improve adherence, motivation, and outcomes in chronic disease management. However, their effectiveness and implementation in COPD remain underexplored.

objectiveThis review synthesizes current evidence on gamified interventions for COPD management to evaluate their effectiveness, focusing on patient engagement, physical outcomes, and quality of life.

methodsWe conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, IEEE Xplore, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure for studies published from January 2014 to October 2024. Only original studies involving trials (both randomized controlled trials [RCTs] and non-RCTs), intervention studies, feasibility studies, cross-sectional surveys, or qualitative studies were included.

resultsA total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria: 11 (38%) RCTs; 7 (24%) pilot studies; 5 (17%) observational studies (including qualitative studies); and 6 (21%) other studies using gamified technologies such as virtual reality, exergames, and mobile apps. Compared to nongamified methods, gamified interventions provided an engaging, home-based alternative for COPD management, supporting long-term rehabilitation. Gamification features such as real-time feedback, adaptive challenges, and personalized goals increased patient adherence and motivation, with high engagement seen in virtual reality and exergame-based interventions, and showed notable improvements in COPD management, enhancing exercise tolerance, self-management, and symptom control. However, most of the studies (22/29, 76%) were of short duration, with small sample sizes.

conclusionsGamified COPD management tools offer flexibility and empower patients to self-manage their condition, potentially reducing the need for clinic visits. Gamified interventions show promise in COPD management, although current studies have methodological limitations. Future research should focus on conducting larger trials to assess the sustained impact of gamified interventions on COPD outcomes; developing culturally relevant adaptations to enhance the global applicability of these interventions; and collaborating with patients, clinicians, and game developers to make the interventions more engaging and effective.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseCOPD managementdigital healthgamified interventionspatient engagementpulmonary rehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID40446290
PMCPMC12166322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.