Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40446217›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025

The Effectiveness of the Be Prepared mHealth App on Recovery of Physical Functioning After Major Elective Surgery: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Miriam van der Velde, Marike van der Leeden, Edwin Geleijn, Cindy Veenhof, Karin Valkenet, Be Prepared Group

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miriam van der VeldeResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Center for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, Heidelberglaan 7, Utrecht, 3264 LJ, The Netherlands, 31 0642214251.ORCID 0000-0002-3464-9794
Marike van der LeedenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6465-0983
Edwin GeleijnDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1521-6456
Cindy VeenhofResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Center for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, Heidelberglaan 7, Utrecht, 3264 LJ, The Netherlands, 31 0642214251.ORCID 0000-0003-0970-2896
Karin ValkenetResearch Group Innovation of Human Movement Care, Center for Healthy and Sustainable Living, HU University of Applied Sciences, Heidelberglaan 7, Utrecht, 3264 LJ, The Netherlands, 31 0642214251.ORCID 0000-0002-4715-685X
Be Prepared Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patients undergoing major surgery are at risk of complications and delayed recovery. Prehabilitation has shown promise in improving postoperative outcomes. Offering prehabilitation by means of mHealth can help overcome barriers to participating in prehabilitation and empower patients prior to major surgery. We developed the Be Prepared mHealth app, which has shown potential in an earlier pilot study. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the Be Prepared app on postoperative recovery of physical functioning (PF) in patients undergoing major elective surgery. Methods: This study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 arms. Adults scheduled for major elective surgery were randomly assigned to the control (usual care) or intervention group (Be Prepared app in addition to usual care). The Be Prepared app is a smartphone app with pre- and postoperative information and instructions on changing risk behavior for patients undergoing major elective surgery. The primary outcome was recovery of postoperative PF up to 12 weeks after hospital discharge measured with the Computer Adaptive Test Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-PF. Secondary outcomes included social participation, self-reported recovery, health-related quality of life, postoperative outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Measurements were performed at 5 time points: before random assignment and 1, 3, 6, and 12 weeks after hospital discharge. Results: A total of 369 patients were analyzed, 181 in the control group and 188 in the intervention group. The result of the linear mixed effects model showed a mean slope difference in recovery of PF over 12 weeks of 2.97 (95% CI 0.90-5.02) in favor of the intervention group. However, this effect was not clinically relevant and was negated by the significantly lower PF score 1 week after hospital discharge in the intervention group (mean difference -1.72, 95% CI -3.38 to -0.07). Most secondary outcome measures did not show significantly greater improvements in the intervention group compared to the control group. Patient satisfaction with overall perioperative care was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group and satisfaction with the Be Prepared app was high. Conclusions: The use of the Be Prepared app as a stand-alone intervention does not seem beneficial for improving postoperative recovery in patients undergoing major surgery. However, satisfaction with perioperative care was higher in patients using the app. Given the advantages of digital technology in health care, it can be considered a basis for prehabilitation care pathways, complemented by guidance from health care professionals as needed.

Indexed as

Elective Surgical ProceduresMobile ApplicationsRecovery of FunctionAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicinedigital healthmHealthperioperative careprehabilitationsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40446217
PMCPMC12143736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.