Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40446211›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Drone-based observations of scarring patterns in humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the New York Bight provide insight into foraging behavior and anthropogenic threats.

Siobhan E Keeling, Chelsi Napoli, Joshua Meza-Fidalgo, Julia S Stepanuk, Nathan Hirtle, Zachary Hoffman, Lesley H Thorne

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Humpback Whales (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siobhan E KeelingSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Chelsi NapoliDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Joshua Meza-FidalgoSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0008-1467-3114
Julia S StepanukSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Nathan HirtleSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Zachary HoffmanSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.
Lesley H ThorneSchool of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-6297-0091

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large whales face a range of threats, including vessel strikes and entanglement in fishing gear. Elevated humpback whale mortality, predominantly in juveniles, has occurred in the Northeast US since 2016. The New York Bight, a region with dense shipping and fishing vessel traffic, has become a hotspot for these strandings. Scarring patterns can provide information on anthropogenic threats, as well as predation and behavior. We used drone imagery to examine scarring reflective of entanglements, vessel strikes, killer whale interactions and bottom feeding in both juvenile and adult humpback whales in the New York Bight. The vast majority of both adult (87.1%) and juvenile (86.8%) humpbacks showed entanglement scars, indicating that humpbacks frequently interact with fishing gear across age classes. Vessel strike scars were observed more frequently in juvenile whales (14.2%) than in adults (2.2%), in contrast to prior observations north of our study area in the Gulf of Maine, though the difference was of borderline significance (mean p-value 0.051, Fisher's Exact tests on 1000 bootstrapped populations incorporating uncertainty in length measurements). These results support previous suggestions that juvenile humpbacks in the New York Bight may be particularly vulnerable to vessel strike due to inshore and surface feeding, and suggest that vessel strike scars may be obtained locally. Killer whales are thought to primarily target young animals, and killer whale scars were observed more often in juveniles (11.6%) than adults (4.4%), though this difference was not significant (mean p-value 0.26). Jaw scuffing indicative of bottom feeding was observed more frequently in adults (68.9%) than in juveniles (27.4%; mean p-value 3.47 x 10-5), suggesting that this behavior is acquired as whales mature. Our findings underscore differences in behavior between adult and juvenile humpback whales and highlight the exposure of humpback whales to anthropogenic threats in heavily urbanized coastal regions.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsFeeding BehaviorHumpback WhaleAnimalsNew YorkPredatory BehaviorShips

Identifiers

PMID40446211
PMCPMC12124855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.