Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40446207›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2025

The Slx4-Rad1-Rad10 nuclease differentially regulates deletions and duplications induced by a replication fork barrier.

Marina K Triplett, Iffat Ahmed, Swathi Shekharan, Lorraine S Symington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marina K TriplettIntegrated Program in Cellular, Molecular, and Biomedical Studies, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3547-2839
Iffat AhmedDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9356-0565
Swathi ShekharanColumbia University/Amgen Summer Undergraduate Research Program, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7312-1823
Lorraine S SymingtonDepartment of Microbiology & Immunology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-4800

Funding

The Role of CTIP in Lymphocyte Development and LymphomagenesisP01CA174653 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GAUTIER, JEAN · 2014 to 2024
$17.6M
Mechanism and regulation of DNA double-strand break repairR35GM126997 · NIGMS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Lorraine S Symington · 2018 to 2026
$5.9M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA174653NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM126997
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome instability is a hallmark of cancer that can be caused by DNA replication stress. Copy number variation (CNV) is a type of genomic instability that has been associated with both tumorigenesis and drug resistance, but how these structural variants form in response to replication stress is not fully understood. Here, we established a direct repeat genetic reporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to detect recombination events that result in either a duplication or a deletion. Using this system, we measured recombination resulting from site-specific replication fork stalling initiated by Tus binding to an array of Ter sites. We found that a Tus/Ter fork block downstream of direct repeats induced CNV by a mechanism involving the Mph1 translocase, Exo1-catalyzed end resection and Rad51-dependent strand invasion. While the Slx4 scaffold protein and its nuclease-binding partner, Rad1-Rad10, were shown to be required for duplications, we found that they suppress deletion formation in this context. These opposing functions suggest that both recombination products arise through a large loop heteroduplex intermediate that is cleaved by Rad1-Rad10 in a manner that promotes duplications and eliminates deletions. Taken together, these studies give insight into the mechanisms governing CNV in the context of replication fork stalling, which may ultimately provide a better understanding of how replication stress contributes to cancer and other diseases characterized by genome instability.

Indexed as

DNA ReplicationEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesRecombinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Copy Number VariationsDNA Repair EnzymesExodeoxyribonucleasesGenomic InstabilityRad51 RecombinaseRecombination, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSingle-Strand Specific DNA and RNA EndonucleasesDEAD-box RNA HelicasesDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Repair EnzymesEndodeoxyribonucleasesEndonucleasesExodeoxyribonucleasesMPH1 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD10 protein, S cerevisiaeRAD1 protein, S cerevisiaeRad51 RecombinaseRecombinasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSingle-Strand Specific DNA and RNA EndonucleasesSLX4 protein, S cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID40446207
PMCPMC12151478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.