ArticleDevelopment (Cambridge, England)2025
Identifying optimal conditions for precise knock-in of exogenous DNA into the zebrafish genome.
Article in Development (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing knock-in approaches for robust genome editing in zebrafish.Biology open · 2026Article
- Advancing Knock-In Approaches for Robust Genome Editing in Zebrafish.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- High-Frequency Generation of Homozygous/Biallelic Mutants via CRISPR/Cas9 Driven byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CRISPR nucleases can be used to insert exogenous DNA into the zebrafish genome by homology-dependent repair (HDR), although germline transmission rates for precise edits remain quite low. Comparative studies to optimize HDR parameters for introducing base pair changes using short-read deep sequencing have been successful, but similar analysis for insertions is challenging due to read-length constraints. Here, we quantified editing outcomes using long-read sequencing to identify optimal template and CRISPR parameters for precise targeted insertion in zebrafish. Through side-by-side comparisons, we found that chemically modified templates out-perform those released in vivo from a plasmid, while Cas9 and Cas12a nucleases performed similarly for targeted insertion. Consistent with previous studies, precise editing rates were dependent on the distance between a double-strand break and the inserted sequence. We further found that non-homologous base pairs in homology templates significantly reduced precise editing rates. Using optimized parameters, we consistently achieved germline founder rates of greater than 20% for precise insertions across four loci. Together, our quantitative analyses identified optimal conditions for precise insertion of exogenous DNA into the zebrafish genome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.