Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40446188›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

On the choice of the phase difference increment in radiofrequency-spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging of liquids with consideration of diffusion.

Jochen Leupold, Matthias Weigel, Sébastien Bär

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jochen LeupoldDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2582-9451
Matthias WeigelTranslational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Sébastien BärDivision of Medical Physics, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In magnetic resonance imaging, the radiofrequency-spoiled gradient-echo method aims for fast acquisition of T1-weighted images. The spoiling mechanism is driven by the radiofrequency phase difference increment. In clinical (in-vivo) imaging, the phase difference increments of 50°, 115.4°, 117° and 150° are in standard use. In this work, we examine how accurate these increments guarantee T1-weighting also in free liquids, in particular with different diffusion coefficients. The non-standard phase difference increment 169°, which was shown to improve T1 quantification methods, is considered as well. Signal simulations were performed with the extended phase-graph with diffusion concept; experiments were performed on different liquid phantoms (water with contrast medium, silicone oil). In the simulations, a parameter space consisting of relaxation times, diffusion coefficient, sequence repetition time, flip angle and image resolution was examined. The resulting efficiency of radiofrequency spoiling was quantified by the average deviation of the simulated signal-vs-flipangle curve from the ideal curve. It was found that ideal spoiling is generally better approximated with a phase difference increment of 169° compared to the other examined values. From the four commonly used values, 115.4° is recommended, in particular when the influence of diffusion is low. For clinical in-vivo imaging parameters, all examined values of the phase difference increments offer a good approximation of ideal spoiling as expected. In conclusion, radiofrequency spoiling in free liquids can be improved by using a phase difference increment of 169°.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingContrast MediaDiffusionHumansPhantoms, ImagingRadio WavesWaterContrast MediaWater

Identifiers

PMID40446188
PMCPMC12124847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.