ArticleHealth policy and planning2025
How policy entrepreneurs solve local health problems in the global South: an exploratory study.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Decolonizing global health in an age of fragmentation: reimagining equity for universal health coverage.Health policy and planning · 2026Article
- Global Surgery as an emerging discipline: Why it thrives despite barriers-And what must happen next.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence, absence, or effectiveness of policy entrepreneurs is often invoked as an explanation for the state of health policy making, especially in the global South. However, much remains under-analyzed about their structure and function. This qualitative study aims to understand how policy entrepreneurs influence policy change in the global South. We complemented a review of the literature (26 papers) with key informant interviews of seven policy entrepreneurs from Zimbabwe. We used an adapted framework with four elements of policy entrepreneurship to frame the analysis: displaying social acuity, defining problems, building teams, and leading by example. Our analysis showed that policy entrepreneurship exists amongst high-level elites and low-level actors. Local policy entrepreneurs tend to exhibit high levels of social acuity to define context-relevant problems and devise holistic solutions. They define situations as problems through comparison with desirable states of affairs, emphasizing the failure of current policies and interpreting data as crises. They achieve team building by constantly re-framing problems to expand policy portrayals and increase the number of people mobilized around the problem. Displaying social acuity stands out as highly consequential for policy entrepreneurship, as it helps in defining problems in a way that resonates with other actors and in mobilizing teams to take collective action. Local policy entrepreneurs lead by example as they implement and demonstrate the workability of their solutions, ultimately proving to be key actors in tackling pervasive and oft-marginalized health problems. That underscores the need to value local ideas as opposed to preference for those that are influenced by global movements. Systematic programmes-such as establishing policy institutes in the global South-should be set up to drive such processes and to, more broadly, support local policy entrepreneurship, including through the formal training of actors in policy sciences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.