Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445980›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Molecular epidemiology and phylogeny of Anaplasma species in goats from Pakistan.

Sumaira Sumaira, Muneer Rehman, Arshad Hussain, Rashid Mehmood, Nimra Ashraf, Ioannis A Giantsis, Waqas Umer, Ayesha Ayesha, Shakir Ullah, Adil Khan and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sumaira SumairaInstitute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Muneer RehmanInstitute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Arshad HussainInstitute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Rashid MehmoodInstitute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Nimra AshrafInstitute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Ioannis A GiantsisDepartment of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Forestry and Natural Environment, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Waqas UmerInstitute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Ayesha AyeshaInstitute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.
Shakir UllahDepartment of Zoology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan Pakistan, Mardan, Pakistan.
Adil KhanDepartment of Zoology, Bacha Khan University, Charsadda, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Mourad Ben SaidLaboratory of Microbiology, National School of Veterinary Medicine of Sidi Thabet, University of Manouba, Manouba, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0001-5567-4721
Furhan IqbalInstitute of Zoology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-4996-0152
Ayman A SwelumDepartment of Animal Production, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3247-5898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite a goat population of approximately 80 million in Pakistan during 2020-2021, the prevalence of vector-borne pathogens in goats remains largely underexplored. This study aimed to assess the molecular prevalence and phylogenetic characteristics of Anaplasma ovis, Anaplasma marginale and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in goat blood samples (N = 239) collected from three districts (Muzaffargarh, Rajanpur, and Dera Ghazi Khan) in Punjab between September 2023 and October 2024. Blood samples were first screened with generic and then with species specific primers. Molecular analyses revealed a prevalence of 39% for Anaplasma spp. and 14% for A. ovis. A. marginale and A. phagocytophilum were not detected. DNA sequencing, by targeting 16S rRNA and msp4 genes, and BLAST analysis confirmed the presence of Anaplasma spp. and A. ovis, respectively. For both screening, bacterial prevalence rates varied significantly across sampling sites (P = 0.01 for Anaplasma spp. and P = 0.04 for A. ovis). Additionally, the prevalence of Anaplasma spp. significantly differed among goat breeds (P = 0.004), while no association was found between goat sex and bacterial infections (P > 0.05 for both screening). Notably, Anaplasma spp. infection was associated with a significant decrease in red blood cell count and hemoglobin concentration, while A. ovis infection did not affect the complete blood count profile. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that our Anaplasma spp. isolates clustered with those from Iran, Cyprus and China while our A. ovis isolates clustered with those from Pakistan, China, and Sudan. In conclusion, this study reports the presence of Anaplasma spp. and A. ovis in Pakistani goats and recommends large-scale studies across diverse geo-climatic regions to further investigate the epidemiology, genetic diversity and host-parasite interactions for effective control of these infections in local goat populations.

Indexed as

AnaplasmaAnaplasmosisGoat DiseasesGoatsAnaplasma marginaleAnaplasma ovisAnaplasma phagocytophilumAnimalsMolecular EpidemiologyPakistanPhylogenyPrevalenceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID40445980
PMCPMC12124494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.