ArticlePloS one2025
What we know and don't know about the antenatal care service utilization in Ethiopia: A scoping review of the literature.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Individual- and Community-Level Predictors of Birth Preparedness and Complication Readiness: Multilevel Evidence from Southern Ethiopia.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effect of perceived distance to health facility on antenatal care service use in Sub-Saharan Africa: Do socio-demographic characteristics modify these associations?Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn Ethiopia, there has been considerable recent investment and prioritization in the maternal health program. However, coverage rates have been low and stagnant for a long time, indicating the existence of systemic utilization barriers. Therefore, it is fundamental to synthesize the current body of knowledge to successfully address these problems and enhance program effectiveness to increase antenatal care (ANC) uptake.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review of the literature. Using various combinations of search strategies, we searched Pubmed/Medline, WHO Library, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and Google for this review. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) were used to conduct the review. We included studies that used any study design, data collection, and analysis methods related to antenatal care utilization.
resultsA total of 76 studies, national surveys, and estimates were included in this review. The analysis revealed that ANC utilization coverage varied considerably by region, from 27% in Somali to 90.6% in the Oromia region, with significant disparities in socioeconomic status, access to healthcare, and vaccination knowledge. Ten priority research areas covering various aspects of the national ANC services were identified through a comprehensive review of the existing body of knowledge led by experts using the Delphi method.
conclusionThe barriers to recommended ANC service utilization differ depending on the context, suggesting that evidence-based, locally customized interventions must be developed and implemented. This review also identified evidence gaps, focusing on health system-related utilization barriers at the lower level, and identified additional research priorities in Ethiopia's ANC service. The first step in developing and executing targeted program approaches could be identifying coverage of ANC services utilization among those with disadvantages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.