SynthesisPloS one2025
Efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin-A injection in the treatment of premature ejaculation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Role of Subcoronal Botulinum Toxin Injection in the Management of Premature Ejaculation.Clinical medicine insights. Case reports · 2026Article
- The Association Between Premature Ejaculation and Non-Dipper Blood Pressure: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPremature ejaculation (PE) is a common male sexual dysfunction, impacting sexual satisfaction and quality of life. Botulinum toxin-A (BoNT-A), known for its muscle-relaxing properties, has been proposed as a treatment for PE, but its efficacy and safety remain uncertain.
objectivesTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of BoNT-A injection compared to placebo for treating PE.
methodsA comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials comparing BoNT-A and placebo in treating PE. Primary outcomes included intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) and premature ejaculation profile (PEP), while sexual satisfaction score was a secondary outcome. Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and odds ratios (OR) for adverse events were calculated using a random-effects model.
resultsThree studies were included in the analysis. BoNT-A significantly increased IELT and PEP at the 1-month follow-up (MD = 22.32; 95% CI = 10.83-33.82; P = 0.001 for IELT; MD = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.41-1.42; P < 0.001 for PEP), but no significant differences were observed at 3-month and 6-month follow-ups (P > 0.05). No significant improvements in sexual satisfaction were found (P = 0.32). BoNT-A was associated with a higher incidence of adverse events compared to placebo (OR = 5.90; 95% CI = 1.29-26.89; P = 0.02), but no significant differences were observed for drippling or erectile dysfunction (P > 0.05).
conclusionBoNT-A injections may be an effective short-term treatment for PE, significantly improving IELT and PEP at 1-month follow-up. However, the effects appear to diminish over time, and no significant improvement in sexual satisfaction was observed. BoNT-A is associated with a higher rate of adverse events, but does not increase the risk of drippling or erectile dysfunction. Further studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to assess long-term efficacy and safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.