Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445927›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Exploring how complex multiple-choice questions could contribute to inequity in introductory physics.

Nicholas T Young, Mark Mills, Rebecca L Matz, Eric F Bell, Caitlin Hayward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicholas T YoungDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1396-416X
Mark MillsCenter for Academic Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Rebecca L MatzCenter for Academic Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-8220-7720
Eric F BellDepartment of Astronomy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.
Caitlin HaywardCenter for Academic Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh-stakes exams significantly impact introductory physics students' final grades and have been shown to be inequitable, often to the detriment of students identifying with groups historically marginalized in physics. Certain types of exam questions may contribute more than other types to the observed equity gaps.

objectiveThe primary objective of this study was to determine whether complex multiple-choice (CMC) questions may be a potential cause of inequity.

methodsWe used four years of data from Problem Roulette, an online, not-for-credit exam preparation program, to address our objective. This data set included 951 Physics II (Electricity and Magnetism) questions, each of which we categorized as CMC or non-CMC. We then compared student performance on each question type and created a multi-level logistic regression model to control individual student and question differences.

resultsStudents performed 7.9 percentage points worse on CMC questions than they did on non-CMC questions. We find minimal additional performance differences based on student performance in the course. The results from mixed-effects models suggest that CMC questions may be contributing to the observed equity gaps, especially for male and female students, though more evidence is needed.

conclusionWe found CMC questions are more difficult for everyone. Future research should examine the source of this difficulty and whether that source is functionally related to learning and assessment. Our data does not support using CMC questions instead of non-CMC questions as a way to differentiate top-performing students from everyone else.

Indexed as

Educational MeasurementPhysicsFemaleHumansMaleStudents

Identifiers

PMID40445927
PMCPMC12124580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.