ArticlePloS one2025
Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic in Latin America: A Data Science standpoint.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the 21st century, the world has faced the devastating impacts of three acute respiratory diseases: Middle East respiratory Syndrome (MERS), Severe Acute respiratory Syndrome (SARS), and COVID-19, which evolved into a pandemic. These diseases have not only caused a large number of deaths but have also damaged the economies of the affected regions. Particularly, countries in the Latin American and Caribbean (LAC) region have faced additional challenges due to more significant social inequalities, limited access to Healthcare services, and precarious living conditions, and it is not clear how these challenges impacted the effects of the mitigation actions adopted by each country. However, this understanding is crucial to guide measures to mitigate Health and socioeconomic impacts if (or when) new acute respiratory diseases emerge, especially in these countries. A retrospective study was conducted to model the dynamics of variation in COVID-19 mortality in LAC countries and to analyze its association with vaccination strategies, containment measures, mobility restrictions, and socioeconomic factors. The study methodology applied clustering techniques that revealed two distinct clusters based on sociodemographic characteristics, followed by the application of XGBoost to model the dynamics of variation in deaths in the countries of each cluster over time. Finally, the SHAP Values technique was applied to understand the associations between mortality and factors such as vaccination, containment measures, and mobility restrictions. The study provides evidence that economic support and the completion of the vaccination scheme were especially relevant in reducing COVID-19 mortality. Two distinct groups of countries were detected, one characterized by a greater vulnerability. The most important interventions for understanding COVID-19 mortality varied between pre- and post-vaccination periods. In the pre-vaccination period, containment measures were the most important interventions for mortality in the less vulnerable countries, while population mobility was more important in the more vulnerable countries. In the post-vaccination period, vaccination coverage was the most important intervention for mortality in the less vulnerable countries, while containment measures impacted the more vulnerable countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.