Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445896›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

XLLC-Net: A lightweight and explainable CNN for accurate lung cancer classification using histopathological images.

Jamin Rahman Jim, Md Eshmam Rayed, M F Mridha, Kamruddin Nur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jamin Rahman JimDepartment of Computer Science, American International University-Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2854-5144
Md Eshmam RayedDepartment of Computer Science, American International University-Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2118-5565
M F MridhaDepartment of Computer Science, American International University-Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5738-1631
Kamruddin NurDepartment of Computer Science, American International University-Bangladesh, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4504-6649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer imaging plays a crucial role in early diagnosis and treatment, where machine learning and deep learning have significantly advanced the accuracy and efficiency of disease classification. This study introduces the Explainable and Lightweight Lung Cancer Net (XLLC-Net), a streamlined convolutional neural network designed for classifying lung cancer from histopathological images. Using the LC25000 dataset, which includes three lung cancer classes and two colon cancer classes, we focused solely on the three lung cancer classes for this study. XLLC-Net effectively discerns complex disease patterns within these classes. The model consists of four convolutional layers and contains merely 3 million parameters, considerably reducing its computational footprint compared to existing deep learning models. This compact architecture facilitates efficient training, completing each epoch in just 60 seconds. Remarkably, XLLC-Net achieves a classification accuracy of 99.62% [Formula: see text] 0.16%, with precision, recall, and F1 score of 99.33% [Formula: see text] 0.30%, 99.67% [Formula: see text] 0.30%, and 99.70% [Formula: see text] 0.30%, respectively. Furthermore, the integration of Explainable AI techniques, such as Saliency Map and GRAD-CAM, enhances the interpretability of the model, offering clear visual insights into its decision-making process. Our results underscore the potential of lightweight DL models in medical imaging, providing high accuracy and rapid training while ensuring model transparency and reliability.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID40445896
PMCPMC12124586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.