ArticlePloS one2025
Predictive modeling of hemoglobin refractive index using Gaussian process regression with interpretability through partial dependence plots.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prediction of prognosis in T4 or N3 locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving chemoradiotherapy using machine learning methods.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting the refractive index of hemoglobin across various wavelengths and concentrations is critical for advancing optical diagnostic techniques in biological and clinical applications. This study introduces a predictive model based on Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) to estimate the refractive index of hemoglobin in both oxygenated and deoxygenated states, covering wavelengths from 400 to 700 nm and concentrations ranging from 0 to 140 g/L. The GPR model effectively captures non-linear relationships, achieving high prediction accuracy with R2 values of 99.4% for the training dataset and 99.3% for the testing dataset. An independent external dataset was used to validate the model's robustness further, yielding an R2 value of 92.80%, RMSE of 0.0042, and MSE of 1.77 × 10 ⁻ ⁵, demonstrating the model's strong generalizability. To enhance interpretability, Partial Dependence Plots (PDPs) were employed to visualize the influence of wavelength and concentration on refractive index predictions, offering clear insights into hemoglobin's optical behavior. The model's ability to provide accurate and interpretable predictions has significant implications for improving the reliability of biophotonic diagnostic tools, such as optical coherence tomography and reflectance spectroscopy, in clinical settings. By combining machine learning with interpretability techniques, this study advances the understanding of hemoglobin's optical properties and sets a benchmark for predictive modeling in biomedical optics, paving the way for more precise and dependable diagnostic applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.