Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445778›Full record

ArticleReproduction & fertility2025

'In the weeds': navigating the complex concerns, challenges and choices associated with medicinal cannabis consumption for endometriosis.

Justin Sinclair, Allie Eathorne, Hannah Adler, Amelia Mardon, Orit Holtzman, Jason Abbott, Jerome Sarris, Mike Armour

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproduction & fertility, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Justin SinclairNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9960-3191
Allie EathorneMedical Research Institute of New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
Hannah AdlerCentre for Social and Cultural Research, Griffith University, Brisbane,Queensland, Australia.
Amelia MardonNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Orit HoltzmanNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Jason AbbottSchool of Clinical Medicine, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
Jerome SarrisNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.
Mike ArmourNICM Health Research Institute, Western Sydney University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-9851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract: People with endometriosis report consuming cannabis to manage their symptoms. Given the range of differing legalities and access pathways across the world, this study aimed to investigate the drivers and barriers to cannabis use worldwide. An online, anonymous, cross-sectional survey was distributed internationally by endometriosis organisations and was open to anyone consuming cannabis for endometriosis symptoms. Survey questions included motivations for both starting and ongoing cannabis consumption, concerns over cannabis use, reasons for stopping cannabis, and communication of cannabis consumption with healthcare providers. Eight hundred and eighty-nine responses were collected across >10 countries. Illicit cannabis (56.7%) was the most common access pathway. 99% of respondents stated they would continue to use cannabis to manage their endometriosis-based symptoms, with 90% reporting they would recommend its use to a friend or relative with the disease. The most common motivation(s) for cannabis consumption were inadequate pain control (68.6%) and bothersome side effects of medications (56.3%). Similar motivations were reported for ongoing cannabis consumption, with concerns over dependence/addiction on pharmaceutical medications (43.9%) being another common motivation. Those using illicit cannabis were significantly less likely (P < 0.0001) to disclose their cannabis consumption to medical professionals. Cannabis was viewed as superior to pharmaceuticals both in terms of effectiveness and side-effect profile. Despite this, concerns around cost, breaking the law, judgement due to stigma, and current drug-driving laws were reported. Illicit usage and lack of medical oversight raise concerns over potential drug interactions or withdrawal effects due to reduction in pharmaceutical medications because of cannabis. Lay summary: Survey participants reported that it is most common internationally for people using cannabis to manage endometriosis pain and associated symptoms to access this illegally, despite medical access being available in many countries. Many respondents also reported that cannabis was more effective and had a more tolerable side-effect profile than pharmaceutical medications they had used previously. However, over half of respondents were concerned about the negative impact of stigma associated with cannabis and how this might affect their day-to-day lives. Other concerns were potentially breaking the law where they live, possibly losing their driving licence due to drug-driving laws, or losing their job due to workplace drug-testing policies. Such concerns may be why more than 30% of participants reported not disclosing their cannabis consumption to their doctor. This is concerning because medical supervision is important to monitor for side effects and potential drug interactions, which people using cannabis may not know exist.

Indexed as

EndometriosisMedical MarijuanaAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMotivationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultMedical Marijuanacannabisconcernsendometriosisnon-disclosurestigma

Identifiers

PMID40445778
PMCPMC12164284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.