ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2025
Exploring Typologies of Immediacy Events in Psychodynamic Therapy: A Latent Class Analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immediacy is a therapeutic intervention that entails the explicit discussion between therapist and client about their relationship in the here-and-now. It is considered a potentially powerful intervention that can facilitate relational processing, especially in psychodynamic psychotherapies. Τhis study aims to explore the use of immediacy in psychodynamic psychotherapy through a case-series analysis. Videos of 139 sessions, drawn from 7 psychotherapies with 2 therapists, were coded in terms of the type of immediacy used and its immediate effects, as reflected in the client's response. A total of 121 immediacy events were identified in 57 sessions, occupying 8% of the total therapy time; the majority were initiated by the therapist. A Latent Class Analysis was conducted to explore where there exist clusters of immediacy events that share patterns of immediacy type and effect. Two distinct clusters of immediacy events were identified. The most common group, which we termed 'limited engagement in immediacy', was characterised by a primarily insight-oriented agenda on the therapist's part, smooth collaboration during the immediacy event, and limited engagement on the client's part. The second cluster, termed 'mutual engagement in immediacy,' reflected more complex processes characterised by conflict, with the therapist using a range of interventions (from alliance-building to insight-oriented interventions), evidence of disruption in the therapist-client collaboration, and the client showing increased engagement and reporting improvement. The findings are discussed drawing upon the literature on the processes of repairing ruptures in the therapeutic alliance and clinical implications regarding the use of immediacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.