Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445764›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2025

Task difficulty modulates the effect of mind wandering on phase dynamics.

Zhengkun Long, Georg Northoff, Xiaolan Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Distinct timescales dissociate spontaneous thought dimensions.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Task difficulty modulates the effect of mind wandering on phase dynamics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhengkun LongState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.ORCID 0009-0008-3291-9528
Georg Northoff *School of Psychology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5236-0951
Xiaolan Fu *State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Science and Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China.

Funding

Fujian Province Science and Technology Plant Project 2022T3016MOST | National Key Research and Development Program of China (NKPs) 2021ZD0204202National Nature Science Foundation of China and the German Research Foundation NSFC 62061136001/DFGTRR-169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mind wandering attenuates widespread sensory and motor processing, both of which are mediated by phase coherence. However, it remains unclear i) whether mind wandering impacts both sensory input and motor output processing by modulating ii) neural entrainment to external stimuli, as measured by intertrial phase coherence (ITPC), and specifically iii) whether task difficulty with different degrees of attentional demands moderates the impact of mind wandering on phase coherence. Using the thought-probe method, we assessed participants' attentional states during different sensory and motor tasks with varying task difficulty. We found that mind wandering decreased ITPC exclusively in less demanding tasks but not in difficult ones, regardless of whether the tasks involved visual input or motor output processing. Our results suggest that external task difficulty may modulate the balance between external and internal cognitive processing (e.g., mind wandering), with simpler tasks facilitating internally oriented cognition and increasing mind wandering. This balance between internal mind wandering and external task difficulty is mediated, in part, by phase coherence, which serves as an underlying neural mechanism. Collectively, our findings support the hypothesis that phase coherence and its dynamics (ITPC) play a key role in mediating the reciprocal balance of internal and external cognition-this suggests their partly shared cognitive-executive resources as entailed by the recently proposed Baseline model of cognition.

Indexed as

AttentionCognitionAdultFemaleHumansMalePsychomotor PerformanceTask Performance and AnalysisYoung Adultinternal and external cognitionmind wanderingphase coherencetask difficultytemporal precision

Identifiers

PMID40445764
PMCPMC12146758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.