ArticleJAMA health forum2025
Projected Outcomes of Removing Fluoride From US Public Water Systems.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Population-Level Fluoride Policies: A Systematic Review of Health and Economic Outcomes.International dental journal · 2026Pooled it
- The association of fluoride exposure with bone density and fracture risk: a dose-response meta-analysis.Environmental health : a global access science source · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Oral Health Care in the United States.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Fluoridation in Chile: historical context, current programs, challenges, and future directions.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Review
- Safe Water Is Rapidly Becoming a Private Good in the United States.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- To fluoridate or not to fluoridate: what is the question?International journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Errors in References Cited and Results Section.JAMA health forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Fluoridation of public water systems has been a cornerstone of public health efforts in the US but has come under increasing scrutiny due to concerns of neurotoxicity. Objective: To determine the cost-effectiveness of cessation of public water fluoridation and associations with oral health outcomes among US children. Design, Setting, and Participants: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to estimate changes in total tooth decay, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs associated with removal of fluoride in public water system during 5- and 10-year periods. A microsimulation model of oral health outcomes was constructed based on oral health and water fluoridation data of US children from age 0 to 19 years in a nationally representative sample from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2013 to 2016. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the simulation results to variation in model input parameters. Data analysis was conducted from November 15, 2024, to February 3, 2025. Exposure: Cessation of public water fluoridation in the US. Main Outcomes: Changes in dental caries prevalence; total number of decayed teeth and dental fluorosis; QALYs; and costs. Results: The simulation model was informed by NHANES data of 8484 participants (mean [SD] age, 9.6 (0.1) years; 4188 [weighted percentage, 49.0%] female). In the base-case scenario of eliminating fluoridation, dental caries prevalence and total number of decayed teeth were estimated to increase by 7.5 (95% uncertainty interval [UI], 6.3 to 8.5) percentage points and by 25.4 million (95% UI, 23.3-27.6 million) cases, with a loss of 2.9 million (95% UI, -3.2 to -2.6 million) QALYs at a cost of $9.8 billion (95% UI, $8.7 to $10.8 billion) over 5 years. Sensitivity analyses estimating less efficacy from fluoridation found lower but still substantial harms. Estimates increased for a 10-year horizon compared to a 5-year horizon. Increased tooth decay would disproportionately affect publicly insured and uninsured children compared to those with private dental insurance. Conclusions and Relevance: This cost-effectiveness analysis found that cessation of public water fluoridation would increase tooth decay and health system costs in the US. Despite concerns regarding toxic effects associated with high levels of fluoride, this model demonstrates the substantial ongoing benefits of water fluoridation at safe levels currently recommended by the US Environmental Protection Agency, the National Toxicity Program, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.