Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445571›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater2025

[The amendment to Austria's medical training regulation permitting continued care by child and adolescent psychiatrists after reaching legal adulthood: a qualitative study on professional attitudes and clinical practice].

Matthias Neumann, Sylvia Dörfler, Anita Holzinger, Verena Steiner-Hofbauer

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Matthias NeumannResearch Centre Transitional Psychiatry, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems, Österreich. matthias.neumann@kl.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-4559-0072
Sylvia DörflerResearch Centre Transitional Psychiatry, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-5058-3443
Anita HolzingerResearch Unit for Curriculum Development, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3109-3487
Verena Steiner-HofbauerResearch Centre Transitional Psychiatry, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Dr. Karl-Dorrek-Straße 30, 3500, Krems, Österreich.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4949-9589

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescents with mental health conditions need stable care structures during their transition to adulthood. The traditionally mandated transfer from child and adolescent psychiatry to adult psychiatric care at the age of 18 does not satisfy this need. A new amendment to the medical training regulations (Ärztinnen/Ärzte-Ausbildungsordnung), effective May 15, 2024, now officially allows child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) in Austria to continue treatment after their patients reach legal adulthood. This study is the first to analyze CAPs' assessments of the amendment and aims to document initial effects on care provision. METHODOLOGY: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 child and adolescent psychiatrists (CAPs) working in various settings. Data analysis was performed using Reflexive Thematic Analysis.

resultsThe study shows that the amendment was introduced unexpectedly for many CAPs, with some private practitioners expressing frustration over the lack of preparation time. Despite this, the reform was largely welcomed and even considered overdue by some. However, given the high patient load, many CAPs still allocate their limited resources to minors, leaving the amendment's impact minimal. In the inpatient sector, persistent shortages of beds have also hindered any substantial changes.

conclusionsWhile the amendment receives substantive approval from the interviewed CAPs, existing resource constraints in both inpatient and outpatient sectors prevent the realization of its potential. The improvements in psychiatric care for transition-age patients intended by the amendment will likely not materialize without capacity expansion.

Indexed as

Adolescent PsychiatryAttitude of Health PersonnelChild PsychiatryTransition to Adult CareAdolescentAdultAustriaChildFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersPsychiatristsQualitative ResearchYoung AdultAmendmentAustriaCareChildren and adolescent psychiatryTransition age

Identifiers

PMID40445571
PMCPMC12660427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.