ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2026
Saddle pulmonary embolism: results of a series of patients undergoing pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with saddle pulmonary embolism (SPE) undergoing pharmaco-mechanical thrombolysis, highlighting the role of specialized multidisciplinary care. This retrospective study describes a series of cases in a Mexican tertiary care hospital with a newly established Pulmonary Embolism Rapid Response Team (PERT). The study took place in a tertiary care hospital in Mexico. Patients or participants: Twelve patients diagnosed with saddle pulmonary embolism were included in the study. All patients underwent catheter-guided thrombolysis and fragmentation as part of their treatment. The main variables of interest included clinical presentation, hemodynamic stability, and outcomes following catheter-directed therapy. Catheter-guided thrombolysis and fragmentation led to significant hemodynamic improvement in all patients. The intervention, combined with standard anticoagulation, showed promise in stabilizing hemodynamics and reducing thrombus burden, potentially improving outcomes in patients with SPE. Specialized multidisciplinary care, as provided by a Pulmonary Embolism Rapid Response Team, is crucial in managing saddle pulmonary embolism. The study offers insights into the safety and efficacy of endovascular interventions in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445553What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.