ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2025
Collaborative frontiers in pediatric neuro-oncology: establishing an international tumor board for enhanced care and global impact.
Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Cancer Care: Challenge and Path Forward.Health science reports · 2026Review
- "From misdiagnosis to precision medicine: strengthening pediatric neuro-oncology care in LMICs toward equitable pLGG outcomes".Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Towards a sub-regional network of neuro-oncology in West Africa: An imperative to bridge the inequalities in care and research and to improve clinical outcomes.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral nervous system tumors are the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in children, with significant disparities in diagnostic and treatment capabilities between low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. This study outlines the establishment of an international neuro-oncology tumor board to address these gaps.
methodsThe tumor board was initiated in January 2021 through a partnership between Washington University in St. Louis, USA, and nine institutions, ultimately expanding to 39 institutions across 25 countries. Monthly virtual meetings facilitated multi-disciplinary case reviews offering diagnostic and management recommendations. A retrospective analysis of 29 sessions over three years was conducted, and a cross-sectional web-based survey among participants assessed their experiences and satisfaction.
resultsFrom January 2021 to December 2023, 101 cases were reviewed. The most diagnoses were low-grade gliomas (23.4%) and neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2 (32.7%). Newly diagnosed cases comprised 51%, while 40% involved recurrent or progressive disease, and 9% were inquiries during ongoing therapy. Recommendations predominantly addressed therapeutic strategies (60.7%). Advanced diagnostics, such as methylation profiling, refined diagnoses in several cases. The survey, with a 35% response rate, showed high satisfaction, with 91% finding the meetings educational. Barriers included time constraints (71%) and conflicting commitments (27%).
conclusionThis initiative, to our knowledge, represents the largest international pediatric neuro-oncology tumor board. Multidisciplinary discussions improved diagnostic precision, informed therapeutic decision-making and facilitated educational exchange. Participants reported positive impacts on professional development and alignment with institutional needs. Despite challenges, this study highlights telemedicine's potential to bridge resource disparities and improve the outcomes globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445524What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.