ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Seroprevalence of Neospora spp. in horses reared in rural and urban areas in southern Brazil.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Protozoan Neospora spp. is known to negatively affect horses reared in rural and urban environments, being studied for causing abortion, neonatal mortality and central nervous system disorders in horses. This study aimed to verify the occurrence of anti-Neospora spp. antibodies in horses bred in rural and urban areas from southern Brazil and the risk factors associated with infection. The study consisted of 400 horses, which 241 were bred in rural areas and 159 in urban areas. The detection of serum anti-Neospora spp. antibodies was determined using Immunofluorescence Antibody Test (IFAT). The epidemiological questionnaire was applied to owners to determine the factors associated with the infection. The total seropositivity of the animals was 11% (43/400, 95% CI = 7,71-13,78%), distributed into 10% (24/241, 95% CI = 6,18-13,74%) in the rural and 12% (19/159, 95% CI = 6,91 - 16,99%) in the urban group (serum titer ≥ 50). There was no significant difference between rural and urban groups (p = 0.642; OD = 1.31; 95% CI = 0.663-2.58). Stallions and geldings in the rural group were four times more predisposed to presenting anti-Neospora spp. antibodies (p = 0.028; OR = 4.36; 95% CI = 1.164; 14.000). In conclusion, the breeding area is not correlated with seropositivity for Neospora spp. and stallions and geldings raised in rural environments from southern Brazil are more predisposed to infection. There are still poorly elucidated aspects of the infection by Neospora spp. in horses of different sexes, reared in different breeding environments that deserve our concern and require further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.