ArticleOral radiology2025
Deploying a novel deep learning framework for segmentation of specific anatomical structures on cone-beam CT.
Article in Oral radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence-based segmentation of mandibular canal on cone-beam computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Oral radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Validation of artificial intelligence-assisted CBCT analysis for predicting inferior alveolar nerve proximity to impacted mandibular third molars: a diagnostic accuracy study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Automated detection of periapical lesions in pediatric panoramic radiographs using YOLOv7: a retrospective internal validation study.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- AI-Assisted Identification of the Medial Lingual Foramen on CBCT: A Deep Learning Approach for Preoperative Implant Assessment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Multi-class anatomical landmark detection in periapical radiographs with deep learning.Odontology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging plays a crucial role in dentistry, with automatic prediction of anatomical structures on CBCT images potentially enhancing diagnostic and planning procedures. This study aims to predict anatomical structures automatically on CBCT images using a deep learning algorithm. MATERIALS AND
methodsCBCT images from 70 patients were analyzed. Anatomical structures were annotated using a regional segmentation tool within an annotation software by two dentomaxillofacial radiologists. Each volumetric dataset comprised 405 slices, with relevant anatomical structures marked in each slice. Seventy DICOM images were converted to Nifti format, with seven reserved for testing and the remaining sixty-three used for training. The training utilized nnUNetv2 with an initial learning rate of 0.01, decreasing by 0.00001 at each epoch, and was conducted for 1000 epochs. Statistical analysis included accuracy, Dice score, precision, and recall results.
resultsThe segmentation model achieved an accuracy of 0.99 for nasal fossa, maxillary sinus, nasopalatine canal, mandibular canal, foramen mentale, and foramen mandible, with corresponding Dice scores of 0.85, 0.98, 0.79, 0.73, 0.78, and 0.74, respectively. Precision values ranged from 0.73 to 0.98. Maxillary sinus segmentation exhibited the highest performance, while mandibular canal segmentation showed the lowest performance.
conclusionThe results demonstrate high accuracy and precision across most structures, with varying Dice scores indicating the consistency of segmentation. Overall, our segmentation model exhibits robust performance in delineating anatomical features in CBCT images, promising potential applications in dental diagnostics and treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445488What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.