ArticleNeurochemical research2025
Inosine Treatment Attenuates White Matter Injury in Neonatal Rats Exposed to Maternal Inflammation.
Article in Neurochemical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), a severe form of brain injury affecting premature infants, is characterized by damage to the cerebral white matter. Maternal inflammation has been identified as a critical etiological factor contributing to this condition. Microglia play a pivotal role in orchestrating the inflammatory response associated with PVL. To date, there are no established preventive or therapeutic interventions for this condition. Our prior research has indicated that inosine pretreatment during pregnancy notably mitigates maternal inflammation-induced hypomyelination in the offspring. However, it remains undetermined whether inosine administered following maternal inflammation offers protection against white matter injury of their offspring. In this investigation, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats at embryonic day 17 (E17) were administered lipopolysaccharide (LPS) via intraperitoneal injection at a dosage of 350 µg/kg for two consecutive days, resulting in pups that served as PVL models. Following LPS injection, pregnant rats were treated with inosine at a dose of 100 mg/kg, twice daily for one day. Subsequently, the brains of their pups at postnatal day 7 were utilized for further analysis. The findings indicated that inosine treatment markedly diminished neuronal loss in newborn pups with PVL and enhanced myelination by encouraging the formation of myelin proteins and the differentiation of oligodendrocyte precursor cells (OPCs). This was evidenced by an increased number of CC-1 positive mature oligodendrocytes and a reduction in GPR17 levels, a negative regulator of OPCs differentiation. More significantly, inosine treatment not only decreased the quantity of Iba 1 positive microglial cells but also facilitated the shift of microglial phenotype from M1 to M2. This was characterized by a reduction in the expression of M1 microglial markers and pro-inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β), along with an increase in M2 microglial markers and anti-inflammatory factors (IL-4, IL-10). Furthermore, the neuroprotective mechanism of inosine treatment on PVL may be linked to its suppression of TLR4-mediated inflammatory signaling molecules, specifically MyD88 and NF-κB expression, as inosine treatment reversed the elevated expression of TLR4, MyD88, and NF-κB proteins in the brains of PVL pups. In summary, the administration of inosine to pregnant rats exposed to LPS appears to have the potential to reduce brain damage in their PVL pups. The protective mechanism may be partly associated with the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445478What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.