Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445419›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Assessment of financial toxicity in patients with cancer in Slovenia.

Katja Vöröš, Marjeta Skubic, Mojca Bavdaž, Petra Došenović Bonča, Andraž Perhavec, Tjaša Redek, Helena Barbara Zobec Logar, Ivica Ratoša

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Katja VöröšFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marjeta SkubicFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mojca BavdažSchool of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1924-7516
Petra Došenović BončaSchool of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0356-1204
Andraž PerhavecFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0559-3813
Tjaša RedekSchool of Economics and Business, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3100-7208
Helena Barbara Zobec LogarFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9585-1785
Ivica RatošaFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. iratosa@onko-i.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5551-6616

Funding

Slovenian Research And Innovation Agency (ARIS) J7-4540, P3-0429, P5-0128, P5-0117, P5-0441.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the extent of financial toxicity in patients with cancer in Slovenia, measured as perceived financial strain and out-of-pocket expenditures.

methodsThe prospective, cross-sectional study was done at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana from June to October 2023. A newly created individual questionnaire was utilized to obtain data on financial toxicity. Patients completed the questionnaire either on paper or online, with or without the assistance of a researcher. The statistical analysis was based on descriptive and inferential statistics.

resultsA total of 901 surveys were disseminated, of which 659 were returned, corresponding to a response rate of 73%. Most patients had compulsory health insurance and were diagnosed in the public healthcare system. Following a cancer diagnosis, 178 (27%) patients reported a decline in financial satisfaction (subjective assessment), while 150 (22.7%) patients observed a change in their financial capability (objective assessment). Younger patients (p < 0.001), female patients (p < 0.004), patients with lower net household income (p < 0.001), and patients who were employed before the diagnosis (p < 0.001) were at a greater risk for financial toxicity. Patients with breast cancer and colorectal, endometrial, skin (including melanoma), esophageal, stomach, kidney, bladder cancers, and lymphoma had higher self-reported subjective and objective financial toxicity than patients with prostate, lung, and head and neck cancer.

conclusionThis article represents the first comprehensive assessment of financial toxicity among patients with cancer in Slovenia, using perceived financial strain and out-of-pocket expenditures. Most patients reported no significant out-of-pocket costs for the treatment they received. About a quarter of patients with cancer experience financial difficulties.

Indexed as

Cost of IllnessFinancial StressHealth ExpendituresNeoplasmsAdultAgedAge FactorsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFinancing, PersonalHumansInsurance, HealthMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSex FactorsCancerFinancesFinancial burdenFinancial toxicityOut-of-pocket expendituresQuestionnaire

Identifiers

PMID40445419
PMCPMC12125031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.