Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445374›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2025

Optimizing aspiration efficiency in RIRS: the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, irrigation flow, and negative pressure in an vitro study.

Tianfu Ding, Zheng Xu, Zhongyue Huang, Weiguo Hu, Bo Xiao, Jianxing Li

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tianfu DingDepartment of Urology, Research Center for Urinary Disease, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China.
Zheng XuDepartment of Urology, Research Center for Urinary Disease, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China.
Zhongyue HuangDepartment of Urology, Research Center for Urinary Disease, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China.
Weiguo HuDepartment of Urology, Research Center for Urinary Disease, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China.
Bo XiaoDepartment of Urology, Research Center for Urinary Disease, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China. beidaxiaobo@163.com.
Jianxing LiDepartment of Urology, Research Center for Urinary Disease, School of Clinical Medicine, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 102218, China. lijianxing2015@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To examine the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD), irrigation rate, and negative pressure on the efficiency of stone fragment aspiration during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in an in vitro setting. Five grams of stone fragment were precisely measured and placed in renal calyx. A flexible ureteroscope with a Flexible Adjustable Navigation Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) was introduced into the renal calyx, connected to an irrigation pump and suction pump. A urologist performed 1-minute simulated intraoperative aspiration maneuvers. Residual stone dust was collected from the suction system, dried, and reweighed. Experimental variables included ureteroscope dimensions (7.5Fr and 8.6Fr), FANS sizes (10/12Fr and 12/14Fr), negative pressure levels (0.02 MPa and 0.01 MPa), and irrigation flow rates (100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ml/min). Intrarenal pelvic pressure was monitored in real time with a digital pressure transducer probe in the renal pelvis. Experiments were conducted in the upper, middle, and lower calyces, with each parameter combination repeated five times in a randomized order to ensure statistical reliability.The study demonstrated that under low negative pressure (0.01 MPa), stone fragment aspiration efficiency exhibited a parabolic relationship with irrigation flow rate. Maximum efficiency was observed at 200 ml/min across all ureteroscope-FANS configurations. Elevating negative pressure to 0.02 MPa significantly enhanced aspiration efficiency, with peak performance maintained at 200 ml/min. The different positions of the renal calyces have a significant impact on the aspiration efficiency, and the aspiration efficiency of the lower calyx is significantly lower than that of the upper and middle calyces. Smaller FANS-to-endoscope ratios (e.g., 10/12Fr UAS with 7.5Fr f-URS, RESD = 0.75) demonstrated 27.2% lower aspiration efficiency compared to larger sheaths (12/14Fr FANS, RESD = 0.64) at 200 ml/min under 0.02 MPa (P < 0.001). All f-URS and FANS configurations maintained intrapelvic pressure (IPP) within safe thresholds across varying irrigation flow rates and negative pressure conditions.The efficiency and safety of stone fragment aspiration is high when the infusion rate is 200 ml/min and the negative pressure is 0.02Mpa. A smaller RESD leads to greater aspiration efficiency.

Indexed as

Kidney CalculiUreteroscopesUreteroscopyEquipment DesignHumansIn Vitro TechniquesKidney CalicesPressureSuctionTherapeutic IrrigationFlexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheathsIrrigation rateNegative pressureStone free rate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.