ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Optimizing aspiration efficiency in RIRS: the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter, irrigation flow, and negative pressure in an vitro study.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Paradigm shifts in fluid management using suction irrigation pressure autoregulating systems in modern flexible ureteroscopy with flexible and navigable suction access sheath: an evidence-based narrative from EAU Endourology.Current opinion in urology · 2026Review
- [Effect of leg-split-free lateral decubitus position and lithotomy position on renal pelvic pressure and clinical outcomes during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2026Article
- Intelligent pressure-guided flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy improves stone-free rates and reduces infectious complications in upper urinary tract infectious stones.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Monitoring Intrarenal Pressure vs. Irrigation Fluid Absorption for Infection Prevention in Ureteroscopy.Advances in urology · 2026Review
- Comparison of tip-flexible negative pressure suction sheath and conventional sheath in pediatric renal calculi RIRS: the Hotan experience.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Optimizing the Scope-Sheath Compatibility in RIRS: Matching of Reusable and Single-Use Flexible Ureteroscopes with FANS.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To examine the impact of ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD), irrigation rate, and negative pressure on the efficiency of stone fragment aspiration during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in an in vitro setting. Five grams of stone fragment were precisely measured and placed in renal calyx. A flexible ureteroscope with a Flexible Adjustable Navigation Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (FANS) was introduced into the renal calyx, connected to an irrigation pump and suction pump. A urologist performed 1-minute simulated intraoperative aspiration maneuvers. Residual stone dust was collected from the suction system, dried, and reweighed. Experimental variables included ureteroscope dimensions (7.5Fr and 8.6Fr), FANS sizes (10/12Fr and 12/14Fr), negative pressure levels (0.02 MPa and 0.01 MPa), and irrigation flow rates (100, 150, 200, 250, and 300 ml/min). Intrarenal pelvic pressure was monitored in real time with a digital pressure transducer probe in the renal pelvis. Experiments were conducted in the upper, middle, and lower calyces, with each parameter combination repeated five times in a randomized order to ensure statistical reliability.The study demonstrated that under low negative pressure (0.01 MPa), stone fragment aspiration efficiency exhibited a parabolic relationship with irrigation flow rate. Maximum efficiency was observed at 200 ml/min across all ureteroscope-FANS configurations. Elevating negative pressure to 0.02 MPa significantly enhanced aspiration efficiency, with peak performance maintained at 200 ml/min. The different positions of the renal calyces have a significant impact on the aspiration efficiency, and the aspiration efficiency of the lower calyx is significantly lower than that of the upper and middle calyces. Smaller FANS-to-endoscope ratios (e.g., 10/12Fr UAS with 7.5Fr f-URS, RESD = 0.75) demonstrated 27.2% lower aspiration efficiency compared to larger sheaths (12/14Fr FANS, RESD = 0.64) at 200 ml/min under 0.02 MPa (P < 0.001). All f-URS and FANS configurations maintained intrapelvic pressure (IPP) within safe thresholds across varying irrigation flow rates and negative pressure conditions.The efficiency and safety of stone fragment aspiration is high when the infusion rate is 200 ml/min and the negative pressure is 0.02Mpa. A smaller RESD leads to greater aspiration efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445374What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.