ReviewArchives of toxicology2025
Whether aristolochic acid directly drives hepatocarcinogenesis: comprehensive investigations from mutational signatures to animal models.
Review in Archives of toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Role of immune dysregulation in aristolochic acid-induced multisystem toxicities: an insight from systems toxicology.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Beyond Tradition: An Integrated Toxicological, Ecological, and Public Health Perspective on Aristolochic Acids.Journal of applied toxicology : JAT · 2026Review
- Aristolochic Acid and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Critical Review of Genotoxic and Inflammatory Mechanisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Deciphering the mechanism of aristolochic acid I-driven hepatocellular carcinoma through integrated network toxicology and bioinformatics.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Aristolochic acid I accelerates lung adenocarcinoma progression coupled with the upregulation of core oncogenic networks: an integrated network toxicology and experimental study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aristolochic Acid (AA) is a class of naturally occurring compounds characterized by potent genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, predominantly found in plants of the Aristolochia genus. The 1993 Belgian weight-loss incident and subsequent research unequivocally established the association between AA and "Aristolochic Acid Nephropathy" (AAN) as well as Balkan Endemic Nephropathy (BEN), prompting global regulatory actions. AA undergoes nitroreduction to generate highly reactive intermediates, which form persistent DNA adducts, inducing A:T to T:A transversion mutations during DNA replication. In 2017, 78% (76/98) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) samples collected from two Taiwanese hospitals exhibited the characteristic mutational signature COSMIC SBS22, sparking a global debate on whether AA contributes to liver carcinogenesis. This review systematically synthesizes the research progress on AA, encompassing its historical applications, metabolic mechanisms, genotoxic features, and its potential causal relationship with HCC. It highlights the necessity of employing multi-omics technologies to elucidate the regulatory networks of AA-metabolizing enzymes, developing non-invasive biomarkers, and rigorously validating carcinogenic mechanisms through animal models. Furthermore, strengthening the regulation of AA-containing herbal medicines and enhancing global exposure surveillance are imperative for mitigating the burden of liver cancer. This review provides a comprehensive perspective on the toxicological mechanisms and carcinogenic risks of AA, offering insights into precision prevention and intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445366What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.