ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2025
Long-Term Outcome of Selective Dorsal Rhizotomy for Spastic Children.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Given the concerns associated with the ageing process in adults with cerebral palsy (CP) and the significant number of children who have undergone selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) in the recent decades, there is an important clinical need to evaluate both the short- and long-term impacts of this invasive and irreversible neurosurgical procedure. To gain insight in the health condition, the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model was used. The ICF serves as a biopsychosocial model for evaluating individuals with disabilities, providing a comprehensive perspective that encompasses understanding both the 'body structure and function' of individuals and determining the level of 'activity and participation' within the community. Furthermore, this review incorporates the dimension 'quality of life' as an essential factor to be discussed in relation to the outcomes of SDR. Based on a narrative literature review, this chapter outlines the outcomes observed at 5-15 years and 15-25 years post-SDR. Additionally, insights into outcomes beyond 25 years after SDR have been provided, drawing on the experiences of the Cape Town research group in South Africa, where SDR was reintroduced on a large scale by Warwick Peacock in the 1980s. The chapter concludes with a discussion on complications following SDR. This review will provide the clinical community and parents with information about the short- and long-term outcomes of this neurosurgical intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445350What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.