Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445348›Full record

ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2025

Functional Posterior Rhizotomy with the Use of Intraoperative Neurophysiology.

Nobuhito Morota

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nobuhito MorotaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kitasato University Hospital, Minami-Ku, Sagamihara, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraoperative neurophysiology (ION) plays a crucial role in dorsal rhizotomy, a procedure aimed at reducing spasticity while preserving neural function. ION encompasses monitoring and mapping, with the mapping of the root/rootlet constituting a significant component. Despite the acknowledged roles of ION, persistent controversies exist, and a universally accepted standard for integrating ION procedures into dorsal rhizotomy remains elusive. This chapter provides a detailed explanation of the author's approach to dorsal rhizotomy, with a primary focus on the decision-making process for root/rootlet cutting. This process involves tetanic electrical stimulation of dorsal root/rootlet for rhizotomy, pudendal mapping to prevent urological complications, and monitoring the bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR). Additionally, the chapter introduces the use of the F-wave for assessing spasticity. The author terms this ION-guided dorsal rhizotomy as "functional posterior rhizotomy," signifying a shift toward a more functionally oriented procedure extending beyond root selection. The application of ION in this procedure is systematic, ensuring both spasticity reduction and the preservation of urinary function. Decision-making for root/rootlet cutting is a multifactorial process, incorporating ION results, spasticity distribution, patient age, and preoperative function. This functional approach aims to minimize the cutting rate through the comprehensive utilization of ION procedures and a cutting rate formula correlating with the GMFM-88 score. In conclusion, ION proves integral to dorsal rhizotomy, facilitating functional root/rootlet selection for spasticity reduction, preserving neural function, and offering predictive insights into surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Intraoperative Neurophysiological MonitoringMuscle SpasticityRhizotomySpinal Nerve RootsHumansBulbocavernosus reflexDorsal rootF-waveIntraoperative neurophysiologyPudendal mappingRhizotomySpasticity

Identifiers

PMID40445348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.