ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2025
Neurophysiological and Neuroanatomical Background of Spasticity: Surgical Implication for Dorsal Rhizotomy in Cerebral Palsy.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spasticity arises from the exaggeration of the monosynaptic reflex, attributed to the loss of inhibitory influences from descending supraspinal structures, though not exclusively. Defined by its resistance to muscle stretching, spasticity yields two significant outcomes. Firstly, muscles tend to remain in a shortened position, restricting movement. Secondly, hypertonia, coupled with a lack of mobilization, leads to soft tissue changes, including a loss of viscoelasticity. This non-velocity-dependent biomechanical aspect limits movements, even at slow velocities, rendering them unresponsive to antispastic agents. Proactively addressing hypertonia/spasticity is crucial to prevent the fixation of disorders and the potential irreducibility of this vicious circle. Understanding the role of the reticular formation, its afferent projections, and efferent pathways is essential for comprehending circadian tone variations and the variability in clinical presentations among patients. The mechanism of hypertonia in children with cerebral palsy is twofold: a neural component due to spasticity (velocity dependent) and a biomechanical component linked to soft tissue changes. Although clinically challenging to differentiate, this distinction is crucial, as only the former responds to antispastic treatments, while the latter requires physiotherapy. Additionally, spasticity is often accompanied by dystonia, a sustained hypertonic state induced by voluntary motion attempts. Distinguishing spasticity from dystonia is essential, as dorsal rhizotomy minimally affects the dystonic component. Spasticity, by opposing muscle stretching and lengthening, leads to muscles remaining in a shortened position, resulting in soft tissue changes and contracture, ultimately restricting movements. Hypertonia and lack of mobilization create a vicious circle, culminating in severe locomotor disability due to irreducible musculotendinous retraction and joint ankylosis/bone deformities. These evolving consequences must be carefully considered during a child's assessment for decision-making. The hypotonic effects of lumbosacral dorsal rhizotomy, acting not only at a segmental level on the lower limbs but also supra-segmentally through the reticular formation, are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445338What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.