ReviewAdvances and technical standards in neurosurgery2025
History of Dorsal Rhizotomy for Spasticity.
Review in Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The history of dorsal rhizotomy for the treatment of spasticity was reviewed, from its inception to future perspectives. The evolution of this surgical intervention was staged into five distinct phases: "Dawn and Decline," "Revival," "Establishment," "Development," and "Future." Key contributions during each period were highlighted, with particular focus on the progression of surgical techniques and the evolution of intraoperative neurophysiological procedure. Insights leant from this historical review provide valuable guidance for the future development of dorsal rhizotomy in the management of spasticity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445337What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.