Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445325›Full record

Observational studyAnnals of African medicine2026

Biochemical Markers as Predictors of Coronavirus Disease-2019 Severity and Intensive Care Unit Admission: A Retrospective Study in Saudi Arabia.

Abdulrahman Mohammed Hakami

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Abdulrahman Mohammed HakamiDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsCoronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging infectious disease that can present with a wide range of symptoms and lead to increased mortality by causing extreme respiratory failure, multiple organ dysfunction, and death. Several biochemical markers have been proposed to predicting the severity of COVID-19 and the consequent need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission. This study provides insight into the role of different laboratory parameters as a minimally invasive method in the prediction of COVID-19 severity and the need for ICU admission. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective observational study included all patients with positive real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results for COVID-19 who were hospitalized at the Ministry of Health South Al-Qunfudah General Hospital between March and September 30, 2020. Laboratory parameters (white blood cell [WBC] count, lymphocytes, lactate dehydrogenase [LDH], and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) levels were evaluated.

resultsBiochemical parameters were analyzed in 342 COVID-19 patients, comprising 206 males and 136 females, with a mean age of 54 years. 97 patients had critical illnesses, while 245 had noncritical illnesses. Critical illness was defined as a condition that required intensive care or that resulted in death. Noncritical illnesses did not require intensive care, resulting in recovery. High LDH levels were significantly associated with critical COVID-19 cases compared with noncritical cases. WBC and lymphocyte parameter analyses included 287 patients. Of these, 170 were male and 117 were female. These analyses were conducted under severe conditions. The mean WBC count was significantly higher in the critical cases than in the noncritical cases (11.15 vs. 6.96, P = 0.001). The mean lymphocyte count (LC) was significantly lower in critical cases than in noncritical cases (1.11 vs. 1.89, P = 0.007). Age and sex were not significantly associated with the disease severity or mortality. The ESR parameter analysis included 161 patients. Based on the severity of the condition, there were 63 women. These patients' critical outcomes included 15 patients, while the noncritical outcomes included 146 patients; however, it was not significant to compare critical and noncritical patients, indicating that these parameters cannot be used as biomarkers to predict the severity of COVID-19.

conclusionsWe studied the effects of various biochemical markers on the prognosis of COVID-19. Our findings concluded critical COVID-19 is associated with significantly increased WBCs counts, LDH, and decreased LC. The ESR is not a potential biomarker for predicting the severity of COVID-19. It is important to note that the use of biochemical markers to assess severity has been reported in the literature, and further research is required to validate their effectiveness.

Indexed as

COVID-19Intensive Care UnitsAdultAgedBiomarkersBlood SedimentationCritical IllnessFemaleHospitalizationHumansLeukocyte CountL-Lactate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2BiomarkersL-Lactate DehydrogenaseCoronavirus disease-2019COVID-19criticalcritiqueerythrocyte sedimentation ratelactate dehydrogenaselymphocytesmarqueurs biochimiquesmortalitéwhite blood cell

Identifiers

PMID40445325
PMCPMC12872144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.