ArticleWiener klinische Wochenschrift2025
Behavioral recommendations following gynecological surgery.
Article in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative care is critical for recovery after gynecological procedures. Yet, the absence of consistent guidelines often leaves patients uncertain, potentially hindering healing. This study aimed to assess behavioral recommendations provided by Austrian gynecologists and hospitals to inform the development of standardised postoperative guidance. PATIENTS AND METHODOLOGY: Between December 2023 and April 2024, questionnaires were sent to 118 gynecologists and 79 hospitals, covering postoperative advice for hysteroscopy, large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ) conisation, tension-free vaginal tape (TVT), laparoscopy, hysterectomy, and caesarean section. Topics included duration of sick leave, follow-up, bathing, tampon use, sexual activity, sports, and lifting restrictions.
resultsResponses were received from 54 gynecologists (46%) and 49 clinics (62%). Clinics tended to recommend more restrictive measures than specialists, particularly for LLETZ, TVT, and laparoscopy, while advice aligned for hysterectomy and caesarean section. Notably, for LLETZ conisation, specialists advised 2-4 weeks of rest, whereas clinics recommended 1-2 weeks (p < 0.05). For hysterectomy and caesarean section, both groups advised 4-6 weeks of recovery, with restrictions on weight lifting, sexual activity, and sports. Variability was also seen in the basis for recommendations: 41% of specialists relied on personal experience, while 41% of clinics cited current evidence.
conclusionThis study highlights significant heterogeneity in postoperative advice across Austria and underscores the need for evidence-based, standardised guidelines to improve the quality and consistency of care in gynecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.