ReviewDer Nervenarzt2025
[Delirium in psychiatric consultation services].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInquiries about delirium are a very common request in psychiatric consultation and liaison services (CL).
objectivesWhat practical procedures can be derived from current recommendations?
methodsEvaluation of current guidelines and literature recommendations, as well as of the experiences in interdisciplinary planning of delirium management at various hospitals and of comments of participants in the author's workshops.
resultsDelirium is seen as a major burden in the treatment of seriously ill patients across all medical disciplines. There are national and international medical guideline recommendations that unanimously recommend institutional delirium management, which follows a standardized approach for the respective department to minimize risk and prevent delirium. Cognitive deficits can follow delirium, especially in old age. Pathophysiological models can support the indication for treatment. Nonpharmacological techniques are effective; pharmacological steps should be carefully considered. Communication with those affected and their relatives and the transition upon discharge or transfer should be explicitly included.
conclusionsThe CL can support steps and department-specific optimization of multiprofessional and delirium management, especially differential psychopharmacotherapy. Further efforts in the implementation of effective delirium management are also possible institutionally in order to improve the prognosis and quality of life of those affected.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.