Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445269›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

The need for improved integration of psychosocial and supportive care in cancer: a qualitative study of Australian patient perspectives.

Clare Lynex, Drew Meehan, Kate Whittaker, Tanya Buchanan, Megan Varlow

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Optimising ovarian cancer care: An embedded mixed methods evaluation of a national nurse-led telehealth program.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Pay It Forward: Analysis of a novel peer-to-peer support initiative for individuals receiving treatment for head and neck cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Clare LynexCancer Council Australia, Sydney, Australia. clare.lynex@cancer.org.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2533-4289
Drew MeehanCancer Council Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4768-0122
Kate WhittakerCancer Council Australia, Sydney, Australia.
Tanya BuchananSchool of Health and Society, Faculty of the Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-9351
Megan VarlowCancer Council Australia, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4964-3435

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt is well established that people diagnosed with cancer often experience poor mental health, yet there are still inequities in access to appropriate care and support. This study set out to explore perceptions and experiences of mental health support, including facilitators and barriers, among people with cancer to help inform national cancer policy development in Australia.

methodsWe conducted semi-structured interviews with nine people diagnosed with cancer who accessed mental health support services or resources during their cancer care. Qualitative analysis using a social-ecological framework identified key themes that shaped their experience.

resultsPsychosocial distress screening was identified as an important facilitator to enable access to needs-based supportive care services. There was strong advocacy for the role of peer support in helping individuals cope with emotional and psychological stressors associated with cancer care. There was a perception that disparities exist in the availability and accessibility of psycho-oncology services outside of metropolitan areas in Australia. Participants acknowledged that even if they had identified unmet supportive care needs and were referred for support, it was not always available, and that inequity exists in the supportive care services available based on cancer type, disease stage, and geographic location.

conclusionNational policy levers aimed at improving the integration and implementation of psychosocial distress screening in cancer care and addressing inequities in access to supportive care services, such as peer support and psycho-oncologists, are needed to ensure adequate support for psychological wellbeing.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesNeoplasmsSocial SupportAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAustraliaFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPsychological DistressQualitative ResearchCancerMental healthPeer supportPsycho-oncologyPsychosocialSupportive care

Identifiers

PMID40445269
PMCPMC12125069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.