Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40445252›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025

Responses of rhizosphere bacterial communities with different niche breadths to liquid fertilizer produced from

Fengan Jia, Fan Chang, Qingan Jia, Yan Li, Lisha Zhen, Rui Lv, Yun Xie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fengan JiaShaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0009-0006-9179-6025
Fan ChangShaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6422-1852
Qingan JiaInstitute of Medical Research, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.
Yan LiShaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.
Lisha ZhenShaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.
Rui LvShaanxi Institute of Microbiology, Xi'an, China.
Yun XieDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.

Funding

Science and technology project of Shaanxi Academy of Science
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of fertilizer in agroecosystems exerts a significant influence on the regulation of soil microbial community and soil properties. However, the impact of liquid fertilizer derived from apple wastes on soil properties, microbiota, and plant growth remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of apple waste liquid fertilizer on rhizosphere microbiota and soil characteristics by analyzing both the bacterial community and physicochemical properties of the soil. The results demonstrated that the application of liquid fertilizer significantly influenced the diversity and structure of bacterial communities. Furthermore, the application mainly increased the niche breadth of bacterial communities, while exerting minimal impact on the assembly process. The rhizosphere bacterial communities treated with a high concentration of liquid fertilizer exhibited increased diversity and broader niche during the late planting period. Moreover, bacterial cooccurrence networks revealed that communities following the application of liquid fertilizer exhibited reduced network nodes and edges, as well as smaller network sizes. These communities were characterized by increased modularity and interconnectedness facilitated by key bacterial indicators such as

Indexed as

BacteriaFertilizersMalusMicrobiotaRhizosphereSoil MicrobiologyNitrogenPhosphorusSoilFertilizersNitrogenPhosphorusSoilapple wastes liquid fertilizerrhizosphere bacterial communitysoil properties

Identifiers

PMID40445252
PMCPMC12211022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.