ReviewWorld journal of urology2025
Visualized bibliometric panorama of ureteral stents (1975-present): trends and hotspots revealed.
Review in World journal of urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ureteral stent (US) is vital in managing ureteral obstruction, ensuring drainage, and providing structural support. Despite extensive research, a comprehensive synthesis of findings is lacking. This study employs bibliometric analysis and visualization tools to examine 2,994 articles from the Web of Science (1975-2024), identifying key researchers, institutions, countries, and trends. Results indicate a rising publication trend, particularly in the last five years, with the United States leading in output and centrality. The University of California System emerged as the top institution. Key journals and bridging keywords such as "complication" and "ureteral obstruction" (centrality > 0.1) highlight critical research areas, including surgical interventions, iatrogenic injury, and stent failure. Clustering revealed hotspots such as intrarenal surgery, ureteropelvic junction obstruction, stent-related symptoms, and benign ureteral obstruction. Current research focuses on guideline development, outcome evaluation, prevalence studies, and complications such as sepsis. This analysis provides insights into US research trends, guiding future innovation and topic selection in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445249What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.