ArticleEuropean child & adolescent psychiatry2025
Psychotic vulnerability in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: associations with clinical features and treatment outcome in two clinical samples.
Article in European child & adolescent psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychotic Vulnerability in Adolescents With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: First Longitudinal Evidence From a Prospective Pilot Study.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Early motor trajectories and distinct psychopathological profiles in adolescents born very and extremely preterm.Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are at increased risk of psychotic disorders; however, the manifestations and clinical implications of psychotic vulnerability among youth with OCD remain poorly understood. To address this gap, we examined the prevalence and clinical correlates of psychotic vulnerability in youth with OCD across two independent samples. Using the Thought Problems Scale of the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), we assessed 215 Scandinavian and 125 North American children and adolescents with OCD. Participants with and without psychotic vulnerability were compared in terms of several clinical features, assessed before and after cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). We examined whether psychotic vulnerability predicted outcome of CBT. Psychotic vulnerability was identified in 41.6% of the Scandinavian and 34.4% of the North American sample. In both samples, participants with psychotic vulnerability had poorer psychosocial functioning and more depressive symptoms at baseline. In the Scandinavian sample those with psychotic vulnerability had poorer psychosocial functioning and more severe anxiety symptoms post-treatment. In the Scandinavian sample, psychotic vulnerability was linked to the symmetry/hoarding dimension, while in the North American sample it was linked to the ordering and contamination-cleaning dimensions at baseline, and only to the contamination-cleaning dimension after treatment. Importantly, psychotic vulnerability did not predict CBT outcome in any of the samples. Our findings show that an in-depth second-level assessment of psychosis risk is merited in many cases of youth with OCD and suggest that treatment gains following CBT for pediatric OCD are similar in those with and without psychotic vulnerability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40445237What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.