ArticleHuman brain mapping2025
Event-Marked Windowed Communication: Inferring Activity Propagation from Neural Time Series.
Article in Human brain mapping, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Evaluating oscillatory mechanisms underlying flexible neural communication in the human brain.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tracking how activity or signal perturbations propagate in nervous systems is crucial to understanding interareal communication in the brain. Current analytical methodologies are not well suited to systematically infer interareal activity propagation from neural time series recordings. Here, we propose Event-marked Windowed Communication (EWC), a framework to infer activity propagation between neural elements by tracking the statistical consequence of spontaneous, endogenous regional perturbations. EWC tracks the downstream effect of these perturbations by subsampling the neural time series and quantifying statistical dependences using established functional connectivity measures. We test EWC on simulations of neural dynamics and demonstrate the retrieval of ground truth motifs of directional signaling, over a range of model configurations. We also show that EWC can capture activity propagation in a computationally efficient manner by benchmarking it against more advanced FC estimation methods such as transfer entropy. Lastly, we showcase the utility of EWC to infer whole-brain activity propagation maps from magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings. Networks computed using EWC were compared to those inferred using transfer entropy and were found to be highly correlated (median r = 0.81 across subjects). Importantly, our framework is flexible and can be applied to activity time series captured by diverse functional neuroimaging modalities, opening new avenues for the study of neural communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.