Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444600›Full record

ArticleHeadache

Identifying and predicting headache trajectories among those with acute post-traumatic headache.

Lingchao Mao, Jing Li, Todd J Schwedt, Teresa Wu, Katherine Ross, Gina Dumkrieger, Dani C Smith, Catherine D Chong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Headache. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lingchao MaoSchool of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Jing LiSchool of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Tech, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Todd J SchwedtDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Teresa WuASU-Mayo Center for Innovative Imaging, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Katherine RossVeterans Health Administration, Phoenix VA Health Care System, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Gina DumkriegerDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9519-5370
Dani C SmithDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Catherine D ChongDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9035-8748

Funding

Biomarker Signature to Predict the Persistence of Post-Traumatic HeadacheR61NS113315 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI CHONG, CATHERINE DANIELA · 2019 to 2019
$3.2M
Biomarker Signature to Predict the Persistence of Post-Traumatic HeadacheR33NS113315 · NINDS · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI CHONG, CATHERINE DANIELA · 2023 to 2024
$2.1M
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke 1R61NS113315-01NINDS NIH HHS R33 NS113315NINDS NIH HHS R61 NS113315United States Department of Defense W81XWH-19-0534
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/

backgroundPost-traumatic headache (PTH) is a common symptom following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Currently, there is no identified way to accurately predict if, when, and at what pace a person will have PTH improvement. In our prior studies, we focused on predicting headache improvement at 3 months post-mTBI. However, that approach may overlook individual differences in how headaches evolve over time. This study aimed to identify individual subgroups based on their headache trajectories and to develop machine-learning (ML) models for early prediction of headache evolution.

methodsParticipants with acute PTH completed a daily electronic headache diary over 3 months, recording their headache-related symptoms. Tensor decomposition was utilized to extract latent factors underlying the time-varying symptoms. We applied clustering techniques on the latent factors to identify patient subgroups with varying headache improvement trajectory. Next, we developed an ML method to classify each individual into a headache trajectory subgroup as early as possible within the 3-month interval.

resultsSeventy-three individuals with acute PTH (mean age = 44.8 years, SD = 14.0; 50 females/23 males) were enrolled between 0 and 59 days post-mTBI. Data from 54 individuals were used as the training cohort for model training, and 19 individuals were used as the test cohort for model evaluation. Tensor decomposition extracted two latent factors: one factor representing the overall state of PTH severity and disability and the other representing the improvement state of these symptoms over 3 months. Clustering identified four patient subgroups with distinct headache evolution trajectories: (1) severe symptoms without improvement, (2) severe symptoms with mild improvement, (3) milder symptoms with substantial improvement, and (4) mildest symptoms with mild improvement. The proposed ML model achieved 0.80 cross-validation accuracy in classifying individuals with PTH into subgroups for the training cohort and 0.84 accuracy for the test cohort. Notably, the model required only the first 2 weeks of headache data to accurately identify the subgroup with the mildest headaches, 3 additional weeks to identify the subgroup with the most severe headaches and no improvement in 3 months, and 2 additional weeks to distinguish the remaining subgroups.

conclusionThis study identified subgroups of individuals with acute PTH with distinct headache improvement trajectories. The proposed ML method accurately classified individuals into these subgroups using the minimally necessary early headache data for each person, including detecting the subgroup with the mildest headaches at 2 weeks. This approach could offer an estimated forecast of headache burden over time and could assist clinicians with determining treatment needs and eligibility for PTH clinical trials.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionDisease ProgressionMachine LearningPost-Traumatic HeadacheAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedheadache diaryheadache frequencymild traumatic brain injurypost‐traumatic headachepredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID40444600
PMCPMC12266634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.