Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444572›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of heart failure2025

Lung ultrasound and mortality in a cardiogenic shock population: A prospective registry-based analysis.

Guido Tavazzi, Costanza Natalia Julia Colombo, Matteo Pagnesi, Maurizio Bertaina, Andrea Montisci, Simone Frea, Marco Marini, Martina Briani, Lisa Patrini, Francesca Rossi and 10 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of heart failure, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. The rise of point-of-care ultrasound in cardiopulmonary diagnostics.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Guido TavazziDepartment of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9560-5138
Costanza Natalia Julia ColomboIntensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Matteo PagnesiInstitute of Cardiology, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-7871
Maurizio BertainaDivision of Cardiology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, ASL Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5727-4107
Andrea MontisciDivision of Cardiothoracic Intensive Care, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy.
Simone FreaDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2977-3299
Marco MariniDivision of Cardiology and ICCU, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, AOU delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2165-556X
Martina BrianiHumanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS Rozzano, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8010-4306
Lisa PatriniIntensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Francesca RossiIntensive Care, Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy.
Letizia BertoldiHumanitas Research Hospital, IRCCS Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Giulia MajDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria SS. Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo, Alessandria, Italy.
Giovanna ViolaCardiology Department and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Carlotta Sorini DiniDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Serafina ValenteDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Gaetano Maria De FerrariDivision of Cardiology, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Department, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy.
Nuccia MoriciIRCCS S. Maria Nascente-Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1070-8857
Federico PappalardoEnna and Policlinico Centro Cuore G.B. Morgagni, Kore University, Catania, Italy.
Alice SaccoCardiology Department and De Gasperis Cardio Center, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
on behalf of the Altshock Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsLung ultrasound (LUS) is a widely used technique to assess de-aeration in critically ill patients with respiratory failure. There is paucity of data on LUS in cardiogenic shock (CS). We sought to evaluate the epidemiology of lung congestion and its relation with outcome. METHODS AND

resultsThe Altshock-2 registry is a multicentre, prospective, observational registry including all-comer CS patients. The LUS protocol included the examination of four zones using dichotomous assessment of lung congestion severity: ≤50% or >50%. LUS was performed at admission and at 24 h. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. Overall, 185 patients (mean age 64.2 ± 13.5 years; 25.9% female) had a LUS at admission. A total of 128 patients (69.2%) had ≥50% of the investigated lung field with B-lines. At univariate Cox regression analysis, B-lines ≥50% at 24 h were significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 4.705; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.329-9.508) and the reduction of B-lines during 24 h was associated with lower 30-day mortality (HR 0.739; 95% CI 0.571-0.956; p = 0.021). Results were confirmed at multivariate analysis after adjustment for significant covariates: B-lines ≥50% at 24 h (HR 2.23; 95% CI 1.042-8.654; p = 0.041) and the reduction in B-lines from baseline to 24 h (HR 0.815; 95% CI 0.415-1.132; p = 0.039). The sensitivity analysis, excluding patients with cardiac arrest, led to significantly increased accuracy in outcome prediction.

conclusionAssessment and monitoring of lung congestion with LUS over the first 24 h in patients with CS allow to further stratify clinical outcomes with higher accuracy when added to SCAI classification, especially when excluding patients with cardiac arrest at CS presentation.

Indexed as

LungRegistriesShock, CardiogenicAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesUltrasonographyB‐linesCardiogenic shockCongestionLung ultrasoundMortality

Identifiers

PMID40444572
PMCPMC12765037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.