ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025
Intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure responses during low-intensity endurance exercise in primary-open angle glaucoma patients versus age- and sex-matched controls: Influence of walking pace and external load.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diet, Exercise, and Lifestyle in Glaucoma: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure responses during low-intensity endurance exercise in primary-open angle glaucoma patients versus age- and sex-matched controls: Influence of walking pace and external load.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study compared the effects of low-intensity endurance exercise at two different walking paces with/without external loads on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG) and matched controls. Twenty-one POAG patients and 17 healthy individuals performed four 400-m walking protocols (slow/fast × with/without loads). IOP was measured before exercise, during the walking test and after 1 and 5 min of recovery. OPP was assessed before exercise and after 1 and 5 min of recovery. IOP was stable in POAG patients during the execution of low-intensity endurance exercise (p = 0.14) regardless of the walking pace and the use of external loads (both p > 0.69). However, controls showed a moderate IOP rise during the walking test (p < 0.001), with this effect being heightened when using external loads (p < 0.001). Both groups experienced a transient OPP rise after exercise (p < 0.001) and this increase was greater in the fast- than the slow-paced condition (p = 0.049). POAG patients showed stable IOP while walking at slow and fast speeds, while OPP increased after walking, particularly at a fast pace. These findings suggest that low-intensity endurance exercise is a safe strategy to improve fitness levels in POAG patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.