Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444540›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

Intraocular pressure and ocular perfusion pressure responses during low-intensity endurance exercise in primary-open angle glaucoma patients versus age- and sex-matched controls: Influence of walking pace and external load.

María Dolores Morenas-Aguilar, Cristina González Hernández, Sara Chacón-Ventura, Santiago Ortiz-Perez, Juan Francisco Ramos-López, Amador García-Ramos, Jesús Vera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

María Dolores Morenas-AguilarDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0924-3255
Cristina González HernándezDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Sara Chacón-VenturaDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Santiago Ortiz-PerezGlaucoma Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Juan Francisco Ramos-LópezGlaucoma Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, Virgen de Las Nieves University Hospital, Granada, Spain.
Amador García-RamosDepartment of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0608-8755
Jesús VeraCLARO (Clinical and Laboratory Applications of Research in Optometry) Laboratory, Department of Optics, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8091-2373

Funding

Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation 13039/501100011033/FEDSpanish Ministry of Science and Innovation PID2021.127505NA.I00/AEI/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study compared the effects of low-intensity endurance exercise at two different walking paces with/without external loads on intraocular pressure (IOP) and ocular perfusion pressure (OPP) in primary open-angle glaucoma patients (POAG) and matched controls. Twenty-one POAG patients and 17 healthy individuals performed four 400-m walking protocols (slow/fast × with/without loads). IOP was measured before exercise, during the walking test and after 1 and 5 min of recovery. OPP was assessed before exercise and after 1 and 5 min of recovery. IOP was stable in POAG patients during the execution of low-intensity endurance exercise (p = 0.14) regardless of the walking pace and the use of external loads (both p > 0.69). However, controls showed a moderate IOP rise during the walking test (p < 0.001), with this effect being heightened when using external loads (p < 0.001). Both groups experienced a transient OPP rise after exercise (p < 0.001) and this increase was greater in the fast- than the slow-paced condition (p = 0.049). POAG patients showed stable IOP while walking at slow and fast speeds, while OPP increased after walking, particularly at a fast pace. These findings suggest that low-intensity endurance exercise is a safe strategy to improve fitness levels in POAG patients.

Indexed as

ExerciseGlaucoma, Open-AngleIntraocular PressurePhysical EnduranceWalkingAgedCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTonometry, Ocularendurance trainingglaucomaphysical activityPOAG patients

Identifiers

PMID40444540
PMCPMC12357220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.