Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444410›Full record

ArticleClinical transplantation2025

Postkidney Transplant Delayed Graft Function Outcomes Are Not Worsened by Deceased Donor Type.

Angela L Zhou, Suseela Raj, Ekaterina Fedorova, Jacqueline Garonzik-Wang, Didier Mandelbrot, Brad C Astor, Sandesh Parajuli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Angela L ZhouDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Suseela RajDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Ekaterina FedorovaDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Jacqueline Garonzik-WangDivision of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Didier MandelbrotDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3326-8583
Brad C AstorDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Sandesh ParajuliDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1667-7465

Funding

Virginia Lee Cook Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKidney-delayed graft function (DGF) is more common in donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors in comparison to donatation after brain death (DBD). We analyzed deceased kidney transplant recipients (DDKTR) at our center between 2005 and 2019, stratified by donor type (DBD vs. DCD).

methodsWe assessed risk factors for DGF, acute rejection (AR), graft failure (GF), along with the death with functioning graft (DWFG), and the interaction between types of donors for those complications.

resultsAmong 2543 DDKTRs, 804 (32%) were from DCD donors. Older donor age, higher recipient body mass index, and receipt of a depleting induction agent were associated with increased risk for DGF in both DBD and DCD. In contrast, preemptive transplant and female recipient gender were associated with reduced risk. Additional risk factors in DBD, but not in DCD recipients, included higher donor terminal serum creatinine, higher kidney donor profile index, right donor kidney, and prolonged cold ischemia time. Female donors were associated with a reduced risk of DGF only among DCD donors. DGF was associated with higher AR and GF, with no significant differences across donor types, DBD vs. DCD (AR: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.22 vs. 2.37, p-interaction = 0.65; GF: 3.04 vs. 2.56; p-interaction = 0.47). DGF was associated with a higher risk for DWFG among DBD (aHR: 3.43, 95% CI: 1.96-6.00, p < 0.001) but not with DCD (aHR: 1.90, 95% CI: 0.78-4.61, p = 0.16), with p-interaction of 0.15

conclusionDespite higher DGF rates in DCD, early adverse outcomes after DGF were similar between deceased donor types and should not deter the utilization of DCD kidneys.

Indexed as

Delayed Graft FunctionGraft RejectionKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationPostoperative ComplicationsTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsAdultBrain DeathCadaverFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft SurvivalHumansKidney Function TestsMaledeceased donorDGFkidney transplantoutcomesrisk factors

Identifiers

PMID40444410
PMCPMC12123557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.