Observational studyTherapeutic advances in respiratory disease
Intrapleural tissue plasminogen activator and deoxyribonuclease in complex pleural effusion and empyema, clinical outcomes, and predictors.
Observational study in Therapeutic advances in respiratory disease. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ultrasound-Guided Small-Caliber Catheter Drainage for Complex Septated Pleural Effusions: Discrimination of Septal Characteristics for Outcomes.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundComplex pleural effusion and empyema (CPPE) is treated with intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) using tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and deoxyribonuclease (DNase) We present our single-center retrospective observational data using a simplified regimen of coadministering six divided doses of tPA and DNase over the course of 3 days.
objectiveTo study the safety, utility, and clinical outcomes of IPFT.
designThis is a single-center retrospective study of patients who received co-administration tPA/DNase for CPPE over a period of 5 years. The primary outcome was successful treatment without the need for surgery. Secondary outcomes were bleeding risk, post-procedural pain, treatment complications, and all-cause mortality at 30 days and 6 months. We have tested the clinical role RAPID score (Renal function measured as urea, Age, fluid Purulence, Infection source, Dietary status measured as albumin) to predict treatment success, and all-cause mortality at 6 months.
resultsA total of (
conclusionResults of our single-center study suggest that IPFT can be safely adopted by small and mid-sized clinical centers, as the risk of bleeding is low. The results of coadministering tPA and DNase are safe, and it reduces the need for surgical intervention in nearly one-third of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.