Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444276›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025

Integrated transcriptomic analysis of COVID-19 stages and recovery: insights into key gene signatures, immune features, and diagnostic biomarkers through machine learning.

Zhiyuan Gong, He An

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhiyuan GongSchool of Medical Technology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
He AnDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Tianjin First Central Hospital, School of Medicine, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 progression and recovery involve complex gene expression changes and immune dysregulation, but their dynamic alterations remain poorly understood. Current clinical indicators lack precision in distinguishing severe cases, highlighting the need for molecular biomarkers and diagnostic tools. Methods: Three transcriptomic datasets were analyzed: 1) COVID-19 progression from Healthy, Moderate, Severe, to ICU patients; 2) recovery stages (1, 3, and 6 months) compared to Healthy controls; and 3) COVID-19 ICU versus non-ICU patients. Differential expression analysis, immune cell infiltration estimation, machine learning (LASSO regression and random forest), and functional enrichment were used to identify key genes and molecular mechanisms. Results: Gene expression analysis revealed dynamic changes during COVID-19 progression. Adaptive immune cells (e.g., B cells and T cells) decreased, while innate immune cells (e.g., monocytes and neutrophils) increased, particularly in ICU patients. Recovery analysis showed significantly reduced adaptive immune cells at 1 month, with partial recovery by 3 and 6 months. Machine learning identified CCR5, CYSLTR1, and KLRG1 as diagnostic biomarkers for distinguishing ICU from non-ICU patients, with AUC values of 0.916, 0.885, and 0.899, respectively. Conclusion: This study identified CCR5, CYSLTR1, and KLRG1 as efficient diagnostic biomarkers for severe COVID-19 using machine learning and revealed immune regulatory features across COVID-19 progression and recovery.

Indexed as

COVID-19gene expression profilingimmune system phenomenaLASSO regressionrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID40444276
PMCPMC12119500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.