Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444249›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025

Relationships between vitamin C intake and COPD assessed by machine learning approaches from the NHANES (2017-2023).

Xinxin Tao, Xianwei Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinxin TaoSchool of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Xianwei YeSchool of Clinical Medicine, Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This research aims to explore the possible link between Vitamin C Intake (VCI) and the incidence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) in Americans aged over 20. Methods: This study analyzed data from 10,757 participants with or without COPD from NHANES (2017-2023). The primary exposure variable, VCI, was grouped by quartiles. Missing data were handled via multiple imputations. A Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) was used to pre-identify VCI -and COPD-related covariates. Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) eliminated highly collinear variables. Machine learning methods (LASSO, Random Forest, and XGBoost) screened variables. A weighted multivariate logistic regression model explored the VCI-COPD relationship. Restricted Cubic Spline (RCS) and threshold analysis examined non-linear relationships. Subgroup analysis and interaction tests ensured reliability. A nomogram showed the predictive factors' importance for COPD. Model performance was reported using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC). Results: In all models, we found that there was a negative correlation between VCI (≥50.1 mg/day) and the prevalence of COPD. The RCS and threshold analysis results show a negative correlation between COPD and VCI (≤135.6 mg/day). Subgroup analysis shows a negative association between VCI and the prevalence of COPD, specifically among females and individuals with dietary fiber intake in the second quartile (Q2). The AUC results show that our model has good diagnostic performance. Limitations: The cross-sectional design limits causal inference and lacks external validation. Conclusion: An elevated VCI within 50.1-135.6 is linked to a decreased risk for COPD.

Indexed as

chronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseLASSORandom ForestRCSvitamin C intakeXGBoost

Identifiers

PMID40444249
PMCPMC12119308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.