Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444208›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2025

Scaling up microdroplet production with post-array devices.

Shuzo Masui, Yusuke Kanno, Takasi Nisisako

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shuzo MasuiDepartment of Precision Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5679-3148
Yusuke KannoLaboratory for Future Interdisciplinary Research of Science and Technology, Institute of Integrated Research, Institute of Science Tokyo, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4706-8160
Takasi NisisakoLaboratory for Future Interdisciplinary Research of Science and Technology, Institute of Integrated Research, Institute of Science Tokyo, 4259 Nagatsuta-cho, Midori-ku, Yokohama 226-8501, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1724-360X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microfluidic systems capable of generating uniform droplets are gaining attention in food, cosmetics, biochemical, and materials applications. While conventional shear- or interfacial tension-driven nozzle devices can generate highly monodisperse droplets (CV < 5%), their scalability is limited by complex flow designs and clogging. Post-array devices have recently emerged as a high-throughput alternative, producing quasi-monodisperse droplets (CV > 12%) by sequentially breaking larger droplets using micro-post structures. These devices offer shear-dependent tunability of droplet sizes, greater resistance to clogging, and scalability. Notably, droplet size is strongly influenced by the dispersed phase fraction, enabling potential decoupling of droplet size and dispersed phase fraction. This study reviews the principles and performance of post-array devices, compares them with other droplet generation methods, and examines their similarities to droplet splitting in T-junctions and premix membrane emulsification. Challenges such as improving droplet uniformity and miniaturization are also discussed to highlight the potential of post-array systems for practical emulsification applications.

Identifiers

PMID40444208
PMCPMC12122067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.