ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Data, dialogue, and design: patient and public involvement and engagement for natural language processing with real-world cancer data.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Co-research in the development of AI and digital health tools for cancer management and care: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study describes the process and outcomes of a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) event designed to incorporate patient perspectives into the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for analyzing unstructured free-text cancer medical notes. The analysis of routinely collected data aims to provide evidence to support clinical decision making in patient groups that are often under-represented in conventional clinical trials, highlighting the critical role of PPIE in responsibly implementing AI within healthcare. The study focuses on ensuring that NLP research reflects patient-centered and clinically relevant considerations. Methods: The event involved 13 participants: nine cancer survivors and caregivers, acting as contributors, and four researchers. These participants engaged in focus group discussions on three key topics: data use, consent preferences, and communication strategies for this type of research. Results: Some key findings included that two-thirds (6/9) of contributors preferred a national opt-out consent model for data use, while one-third (3/9) favored project-specific consent. They offered perspectives on data use, including how it is processed and stored. They also highlighted the importance of clear, accessible information about the research process to build trust and facilitate informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.