Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40444182›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Data, dialogue, and design: patient and public involvement and engagement for natural language processing with real-world cancer data.

Wuraola Oyewusi, Eliana M Vasquez Osorio, Goran Nenadic, Issy MacGregor, Gareth Price

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wuraola OyewusiDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Eliana M Vasquez OsorioDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Goran NenadicDepartment of Computer Science, The School of Engineering, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Issy MacGregorVocal, NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Unit, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Gareth PriceDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: This study describes the process and outcomes of a Patient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) event designed to incorporate patient perspectives into the application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) for analyzing unstructured free-text cancer medical notes. The analysis of routinely collected data aims to provide evidence to support clinical decision making in patient groups that are often under-represented in conventional clinical trials, highlighting the critical role of PPIE in responsibly implementing AI within healthcare. The study focuses on ensuring that NLP research reflects patient-centered and clinically relevant considerations. Methods: The event involved 13 participants: nine cancer survivors and caregivers, acting as contributors, and four researchers. These participants engaged in focus group discussions on three key topics: data use, consent preferences, and communication strategies for this type of research. Results: Some key findings included that two-thirds (6/9) of contributors preferred a national opt-out consent model for data use, while one-third (3/9) favored project-specific consent. They offered perspectives on data use, including how it is processed and stored. They also highlighted the importance of clear, accessible information about the research process to build trust and facilitate informed decision-making.

Indexed as

ethical AInatural language processingNLPpatient advocacypatient and public involvement and engagementPPIEreal world dataRWD

Identifiers

PMID40444182
PMCPMC12119481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.